The Net(book) Effect
Recent Columns
-
Why Do Fools Fall in Love?
Nov 18 200912:01 am EDT -
Where Are the Mile-High Hookups?
Nov 11 200912:01 am EDT -
Tools of the Travel Trade
Nov 04 200912:01 am EDT -
Sky Survivors
Oct 28 200912:01 am EDT -
A Hotel’s Loss Is a Road Warrior’s Gain
Oct 21 200912:01 am EDT -
David Flies Over Goliath
Oct 14 200912:01 am EDT -
The Business-Travel Survival Kit
Oct 07 200912:01 am EDT -
The Truth About Airline Bag Fees
Sep 30 200912:01 am EDT -
Failure to Perform
Sep 23 200912:01 am EDT -
Let's Make Some Travel Deals
Aug 18 200911:57 am EDT
PREV
2 of 2
I admit that a lot of this jockeying has confused me. I traveled with an ultra-slim, three-pound notebook computer more than a decade ago and watched with horror as laptop manufacturers made their machines bigger and heavier in recent years. I didn't want to watch movies on a widescreen display, which added a few inches to the size of a laptop. I didn't want an onboard optical drive, which added weight. I wanted small, light, and mobile, and it seemed that laptop makers had forgotten that a portable computer was supposed to be portable.
I bought my first BlackBerry because I couldn't find a laptop small enough to carry everywhere. Last month I bought the Acer Aspire One on impulse because I was seduced by the small footprint (this one is 7-by-10-by-1 inches) and the light weight. And if it isn't the portable device of my dreams (I've added a mini-mouse and slowed my touch typing), it sure is a break for my aching, aging back as I schlep my carry-on bag through airports and hotels.
Of course, I'm never satisfied. I look at the iPhone and the BlackBerry and wonder why they can't do just a little more so I can ditch my laptop forever. I look at my six-pound laptop, now banished from my carry-on, and can't imagine that I ever accepted it as a "portable."
I look at my new netbook and I already think about buying one of the new models with a 10-inch screen. And while it flawlessly runs simple programs like word processing, email, and Web browsing, its low-powered processor and limited memory (mine has a fairly standard 1 gig) makes it infuriatingly slow for more complex tasks.
And where, I wonder, is my convergence machine, the one that makes calls flawlessly around the world, doubles as my music play, triples as a fully functioning portable computer and fits in my pocket?
Forget it, says Baker.
"One device will not be sufficient," he says. "We will continue to carry both a pocketable smartphone and a lightweight notebook for serious computing. Trying to combine both in a single device is like combining a toaster and microwave."
Don't get me started on toasters. I've been through three in the last two years and I still can't get my bagel toasted properly.
The Fine Print…
Here's some good news: A consortium of 17 cellphone manufacturers and cellular phone companies say they have agreed on a standard for a universal charger for mobile devices. A one-size-fits-all charger may be ready by 2012. The bad news? Neither Apple nor Research in Motion have signed on.
Joe Brancatelli writes Portfolio.com’s business travel column, Seat 2B. Brancatelli is the former executive editor of Frequent Flyer magazine and has written about travel in numerous publications.
PREV
2 of 2





