Recent Columns
-
Airline Madness Hits Europe
Feb 08 201212:01 am EDT -
A Fourth Musketeer in the Skies?
Feb 01 201212:01 am EDT -
The Must-Have Business Travel Apps
Jan 25 201212:01 am EDT -
Travel's Silly Season
Jan 18 201212:01 am EDT -
The Best Airport Hotels Outside the United States
Jan 11 201212:01 am EDT -
The Road Warrior's Guide for 2012
Jan 04 201212:01 am EDT -
The 2012 Airport Dining Guide: Small in Size, Big in Taste
Dec 28 201112:01 am EDT -
The 2012 Airport Dining Guide: Where to Eat Before You Fly
Dec 21 201112:01 am EDT -
The Backscatter Backstory
Dec 14 201112:01 am EDT -
Hotel Histrionics
Dec 07 201112:01 am EDT
PREV
2 of 2
Take tomorrow’s United Flight 23, a crack-of-dawn departure between New York’s Kennedy Airport and Los Angeles International. In the coach cabin, the one-way fares for identical seats can be as low as $159 (the price I was offered in last week’s email) or as high as $975.50 just before departure. There are dozen of fares in between, and the only differences in them are the rules about when I buy, if I purchase a return flight, whether I want to buy the seat on a nonrefundable or flexible basis, or if I have a corporate discount.
Even in the best of times, this pricing crapshoot has never been particularly profitable for airlines. And it always infuriates customers, who never know if they can find the lowest fares in the hedge maze of public and private distribution channels that airlines now use to sell tickets.
But pricing without regard to the actual cost of supplying the product really comes back to bite the airlines when there is a sharp downturn in the economy, a drastic change in the cost of commodities, or, like now, a combination of both.
Consider that $2.9 billion upswing in the industry’s first-quarter fuel expenses. It translated into 2 cents of additional fuel cost for every mile it carried a paying customer. Based on the distance of an average flight (about 721 miles), that’s $14.42 a person. On the 2,470-mile flight between New York and Los Angeles, it’s closer to $50 a passenger.
But since airlines don’t traditionally price based on actual manufacturing cost, customers are never sympathetic when airlines claim they need to raise fares based on fuel prices. After all, business travelers who pay nearly $1,000 to go coast-to-coast are already paying far more than they should. And leisure flyers, trained to look for bargains, refuse to book seats if they are asked to pay more than they expect. Besides, business flyers are cutting back their travel as the economy slows, and leisure travelers are even more cost conscious when they are paying more for groceries, gasoline, and other day-to-day essentials.
And that’s how it goes in Fareland. The airlines will keep raising fares in a desperate attempt to pass on rising costs. Then you’ll find amazing bargains as they make an equally desperate attempt to sell empty seats. How it all plays out on balance sheets remains to be seen.
The Fine Print…
Ever wonder why airlines sometimes raise base airfares and other times impose fuel surcharges? That’s one of the few easy things to explain. Airfare increases are subject to corporate discounts and sale pricing. Fuel surcharges are added after discounts are applied.
Joe Brancatelli writes Portfolio.com’s business travel column, Seat 2B. Brancatelli is the former executive editor of Frequent Flyer magazine and operates the membership site JoeSentMe.com. You can reach him at jbrancatelli@portfolio.com.
PREV
2 of 2
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




