The Great Depression Debate
The Economy of Fear
Recent Columns
-
Showing the Money
Feb 11 20098:00 am EDT -
The Case for Optimism
Jan 07 20098:00 am EDT -
Worst of Times
Nov 11 200812:00 am EDT -
The Morning After
Oct 15 20088:00 am EDT -
Black Hole
Aug 13 20086:00 am EDT
Credit where it is due. In bailing out Bear Stearns’ troubled mortgage portfolio and encouraging J.P. Morgan Chase to buy the rest of the firm for next to nothing, the Fed prevented the mother of all Black Mondays from occurring on March 17, while punishing Bear’s management and stockholders for the company’s recklessness. Had the Fed failed to address Bear’s fate so promptly, panic selling would almost certainly have engulfed Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and other Wall Street firms.
| Also on Portfolio.com:It's (Really) the Economy, Stupid Wall Street turmoil is going to wipe every other issue off the table for the next president. Deficit, SchmeficitThe big banks cowed Bill Clinton into obsessing over the deficit. But our next president will need to spend, spend, spend. |
To be sure, these are challenging times. But the Fed has embarked on a historic change. In extending its protective arm to all of Wall Street, it is evoking the threat of the Great Depression or even one of the 19th century’s epic financial whirlwinds. In 1825, the Bank of England, facing a wholesale panic in London’s financial district, flooded the markets with cash: “We lent it,” a spokesman commented at the time, “by every possible means consistent with the safety of the bank, and we were not, on some occasions, overnice.” Ben Bernanke wasn’t very nice to Bear’s stockholders either, prompting some of them to agitate for more cash from J.P. Morgan to approve the deal. But to everybody else on Wall Street, Bernanke seemed like the tooth fairy. From now on, he was effectively saying, no Wall Street firm is dumb or venal enough to be allowed to fail.



