Recent Blog Posts
-
Is an End Near for Forcible Arbitration?
Apr 25 20098:44 pm EDT -
Bernie Madoff's Deputy Said to be 'Ratting Down'
Apr 24 20099:10 am EDT -
FINRA Decrees: If You Kiss, You Must Tell
Apr 23 20097:25 am EDT -
Mr. Geithner's Neighborhood
Apr 22 200912:17 pm EDT -
Bigot Revels in His Three Seconds of 'Fame'
Apr 21 20094:11 pm EDT -
Bankruptcy for the New York Times?
Apr 21 200910:12 am EDT -
Congress Should Keep its Cotton-Pickin' Hands Off the 'Pecora' Commission
Apr 20 20099:30 am EDT -
The Whisper Campaign Against an Overstock.com Whistleblower
Apr 17 20096:39 pm EDT -
The New York Pension Probe: So What Else is New?
Apr 17 20092:42 pm EDT -
Eureka! Defrauded Investors Are Getting (Gasp) All Their Money Back
Apr 16 20095:47 pm EDT
Bernie Madoff's Deputy Said to be 'Ratting Down'
Fortune is reporting today that a cooperating witness has finally emerged in the Bernie Madoff mess--a key aide by the name of Frank DiPascali.
Seems that DiPascali is "ratting down"--that is, coughing up names not of other people in the Madoff organization or family involved in the ripoff (which would be "ratting up" in cop parlance) but rather some of Madoff's clients.
According to the magazine, DiPascali has told prosecutors that he is
..prepared to testify that he manipulated phony returns on behalf of some key Madoff investors, including Frank Avellino, who used to run a so-called feeder fund, Jeffry Picower, whose foundation had to close as a result of Madoff-related losses, and others. If, for example, one of these special customers had large gains on other investments, he would tell DiPascali, who would fabricate a loss to reduce the tax bill. If true, that would mean these investors knew their returns were fishy.
Well, not necessarily. It could also mean that they thought the returns were genuine and just wanted phony documents.
If these presumably smart people knew that their returns were "fishy" -- in the sense of being fictitious -- why would they stay with Madoff and not just pull out?
Fortune says that "it will likely come as a huge relief to the Madoff family that DiPascali is telling prosecutors they were not participants in the scam. After all, nobody, apart from Bernie Madoff, is better positioned to describe who took part. But it's worth remembering that such a statement represents less than a full exoneration."
Right. It may also be baloney.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





