Recent Blog Posts
-
A Big Fat Geek Survey
May 25 20123:56 pm EDT -
Phasing Out Instagram
May 25 20122:27 pm EDT -
UberConference Is Victorious!
May 24 20121:49 pm EDT -
Ark Floats, Olive Branch Unseen
May 21 20126:30 pm EDT -
Teach the Internet to Forget
May 21 20124:39 pm EDT -
Microsoft Patent Begs the Question:
Who Needs Developers?
May 17 20123:30 pm EDT -
Mozilla's Monitor-Me-Not
May 17 201211:38 am EDT -
Google's Brain Gets Humanized
May 16 20125:30 pm EDT -
Pandora Demographics Aim Wedding Proposal
May 16 201212:19 pm EDT -
New York Techies Get Mappy Way to Job Hunt
May 15 20122:50 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

Amazon Cuts Off Colorado Affiliates Over Tax Law
TechFlash reports: Amazon.com is retaliating against a newly minted Colorado sales tax law. The measure, recently signed by Colorado Governor Bill Ritter, requires online retailers like Amazon to inform Colorado residents how much they owe in sales tax on Web purchases and provide a summary of people's Web purchases to the state.
Amazon is responding by cutting off its Colorado affiliates—businesses that link to Amazon products and receive a fee on any resulting sales. It's a sign that Amazon will continue to play hardball with states that try to tap the company for sales-tax collection.
Amazon's response is surprising because Colorado lawmakers tried to protect Amazon affiliates in crafting the legislation. They originally drafted a bill along the lines of what other states have attempted, classifying Amazon as a retailer with a physical "nexus" based on its ties to local affiliate websites (thus forcing it to collect sales tax).
But affiliates in Colorado—pointing to Amazon's threats to close down affiliate programs in other states that enact such "nexus" legislation—created an uproar over the early version of the bill, and Colorado lawmakers removed the affiliate language.
Amazon, in its letter to Colorado affiliates, indicated it will keep selling in the state. The company did not say whether it would tell Colorado buyers what they owe in sales tax or provide that information to the state, as the new law requires.
This is the first we've heard from Amazon this year on the sales-tax issue. The online retail giant only collects sales tax in a handful of states—putting it into conflict with states that are grappling with budget crises and searching for new sources of revenue.
Here's the full text of the Amazon letter to Colorado affiliates below. The company has not provided any additional comment. I'm reaching out to the Colorado Department of Revenue for their reaction.
Dear Colorado-based Amazon Associate:
We are writing from the Amazon Associates Program to inform you that the Colorado government recently enacted a law to impose sales tax regulations on online retailers. The regulations are burdensome and no other state has similar rules. The new regulations do not require online retailers to collect sales tax. Instead, they are clearly intended to increase the compliance burden to a point where online retailers will be induced to "voluntarily" collect Colorado sales tax—a course we won't take.
We and many others strongly opposed this legislation, known as HB 10-1193, but it was enacted anyway. Regrettably, as a result of the new law, we have decided to stop advertising through Associates based in Colorado. We plan to continue to sell to Colorado residents, however, and will advertise through other channels, including through Associates based in other states.
There is a right way for Colorado to pursue its revenue goals, but this new law is a wrong way. As we repeatedly communicated to Colorado legislators, including those who sponsored and supported the new law, we are not opposed to collecting sales tax within a constitutionally-permissible system applied even-handedly. The US Supreme Court has defined what would be constitutional, and if Colorado would repeal the current law or follow the constitutional approach to collection, we would welcome the opportunity to reinstate Colorado-based Associates.
You may express your views of Colorado's new law to members of the General Assembly and to Governor Ritter, who signed the bill.
Your Associates account has been closed as of March 8, 2010, and we will no longer pay advertising fees for customers you refer to Amazon.com after that date. Please be assured that all qualifying advertising fees earned prior to March 8, 2010, will be processed and paid in accordance with our regular payment schedule. Based on your account closure date of March 8, any final payments will be paid by May 31, 2010.
We have enjoyed working with you and other Colorado-based participants in the Amazon Associates Program, and wish you all the best in your future.
Best Regards,
The Amazon Associates Team
Eric Engleman writes for TechFlash, the Puget Sound Business Journal's technology blog.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





