Recent Blog Posts
-
Obama Blacklisted From Popular New App
Feb 09 20125:20 pm EDT -
Thermostat Startup Nest Comes Out Swinging
Feb 09 201211:46 am EDT -
Apps and Email, Together at Last
Feb 08 20124:30 pm EDT -
The Future Cemetery
Feb 08 201210:15 am EDT -
Open Letter to Congress on SOPA: Take a Breath
Feb 07 20121:00 pm EDT -
Greatest Generation Company Sues iPod Generation Startup Nest
Feb 06 20123:46 pm EDT -
Path Cuts Through Social-Media Noise
Feb 03 201212:10 pm EDT -
Gift Apps That Keep on Giving
Feb 01 20125:19 pm EDT -
A Proxy Piece of the Facebook Pie
Jan 31 20125:00 pm EDT -
Zynga Accused of Copying Bingo Game
Jan 30 20126:12 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

Hulu Eyes Charge for IPad Users
Ars Technica reports: Your favorite shows from Hulu may be coming to the Apple iPad after all, but only if you're a paying customer. Sources speaking to MediaMemo say that Hulu is considering a pay version of Hulu on the iPad as part of its larger plan to eventually charge for content.
The company has been entertaining the idea of introducing some kind of pay model to its TV and movie offerings since at least mid-2009 and probably earlier. Since then, Hulu has been discussing the possibilities a little more publicly, with the most recent talks involving the idea of putting back episodes of shows behind a paywall while keeping recent TV episodes free.
The latest report has the company considering moving from a one-screen model (keeping shows limited to your browser) to a three-screen service: computer, TV, and mobile. "Just three screens alone is pretty enticing," one unnamed executive told MediaMemo.
Indeed, the browser limitation was one that we heavily criticized when the idea of Hulu charging for content first came out; if the company allowed TV and mobile streaming as part of the subscription plan, but kept browser-watching free, it could very well entice consumers to fork over a few dollars every month. "Everyone’s concerned about making a strong offering at a good price, and not undercutting the existing business," another source said.
Such a move move wouldn't be surprising—it's a common practice for companies that offer multiple tiers of service to only make extras available to paying subscribers. The bigger question would be how Hulu plans to bring its content to mobile devices when Flash support is still missing from the most popular of those devices (iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad included).
The company isn't stupid, though—we were told recently that Hulu listens closely to customer requests and is constantly evaluating how it can improve the viewing experience. Translation: we'll consider ditching Flash for other technologies if our customers want it bad enough (and we can convince the content providers to go for it).
Jacqui Cheng is an Associate Editor of Ars Technica.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




