Recent Blog Posts
-
A Big Fat Geek Survey
May 25 20123:56 pm EDT -
Phasing Out Instagram
May 25 20122:27 pm EDT -
UberConference Is Victorious!
May 24 20121:49 pm EDT -
Ark Floats, Olive Branch Unseen
May 21 20126:30 pm EDT -
Teach the Internet to Forget
May 21 20124:39 pm EDT -
Microsoft Patent Begs the Question:
Who Needs Developers?
May 17 20123:30 pm EDT -
Mozilla's Monitor-Me-Not
May 17 201211:38 am EDT -
Google's Brain Gets Humanized
May 16 20125:30 pm EDT -
Pandora Demographics Aim Wedding Proposal
May 16 201212:19 pm EDT -
New York Techies Get Mappy Way to Job Hunt
May 15 20122:50 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

U.K. Rules the World in Bad Copyright Law
Who has the worst "worst, by far" copyright laws in the world? According to a pair of consumer groups, the winner is—wait for it—the UK.
Yes, the country that brought us copyright, modern parliamentary democracy, chocolate Hobnobs, and both Shakespeare and Simon Cowell was rated the absolute worst of sixteen countries surveyed when it came to copyright. The abysmal rating came from the Open Rights Group and Consumer Focus, which dinged the UK for its lack of a broad "fair use" right and the continued existence of rules that prohibit (among other things) legally ripping a CD to one's computer or iPod.
Countries surveyed included China, Australia, Argentina, Indonesia, Pakistan, South Korea, and the US, but the UK's consumer unfriendliness (read the country-specific report) can be seen in the fact that it has no copyright exemption for parody or satire. It also assigns the copyright in most government documents to the Crown, unlike the US government, which places its material in the public domain.
Many of these items were identified as problems by the hugely important Gowers Review back in 2006, but have still not been acted upon. Andrew Gowers, a newspaper editor, recommended that the UK's "fair dealing" laws get a major upgrade and that private ripping of legally purchased CDs be made legal; neither has yet happened.
To some rightsholders, of course, the "bad news" actually looks like "good news," since it gives them even more power to control their material. Consumers widely ignore rules such as the ban on CD ripping, and people aren't prosecuted for doing so, but this sort of copyright overreach simply damages public respect for law and copyrights so long as it remains on the books.
From the consumer point of view, things may get worse, quickly. The European Parliament, pushed by record labels and rock stars like Bono and Sir Cliff Richard, is considering an extension on musical copyrights to 95 years per song.
The Gowers Review said that the current 50-year copyright was plenty of time, but the UK government is pushing for an extension to 70 years. It won't go along with the full 95-year term, however, and has been holding up the legislation in Europe on the grounds that it goes too far. The European Parliament could hold a full vote on the plan next week.
by Nate Anderson for Ars TechnicaComments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





