Recent Blog Posts
-
Where the Tech World Gathers
Feb 10 20125:46 pm EDT -
Obama Blacklisted From Popular New App
Feb 09 20125:20 pm EDT -
Thermostat Startup Nest Comes Out Swinging
Feb 09 201211:46 am EDT -
Apps and Email, Together at Last
Feb 08 20124:30 pm EDT -
The Future Cemetery
Feb 08 201210:15 am EDT -
Open Letter to Congress on SOPA: Take a Breath
Feb 07 20121:00 pm EDT -
Greatest Generation Company Sues iPod Generation Startup Nest
Feb 06 20123:46 pm EDT -
Path Cuts Through Social-Media Noise
Feb 03 201212:10 pm EDT -
Gift Apps That Keep on Giving
Feb 01 20125:19 pm EDT -
A Proxy Piece of the Facebook Pie
Jan 31 20125:00 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

Big Bluff From Big Telcos
The feds plan to hand out some $7.2 billion in stimulus grants to companies that will deliver broadband to communities that have none, but Verizon and AT&T are making noises like they won't apply for the money because there are too many strings attached.
That's according to Bloomberg News, and that's hard to believe.
AT&T, Comcast and Verizon -- the nation's largest ISPs -- don't want to have to build networks constrained by so-called 'net neutrality' provisions that would ban them from giving preferential treatment to some services (such as their own streaming video server) over others (such as YouTube).
Congress said the networks had to be open, but left it to the Department of Agriculture and the Commerce Department's National Telecommunications and Information Administration to figure out what openness actually means.
The money being handed out isn't very much for the big operators, though it's simply a bluff for the companies to say they may not be applying for the funds.
They will apply; it's free money, for goodness sake.
The big telcos just want to prove their point -- that they don't want rules attached to their networks ever, even if it's Uncle Sam's dollars that paid for that fiber.
Jealous of billions made by ringtone sellers and search engines, ISPs are tired of just being the transport layer.
So they plan to run their own video services over their network, sell dedicated chunks of it to websites that can afford first-class service, and find other ways to make money with their network besides simply delivering bits to and from other people's computers.
by Ryan Singel for Wired.com
See Also:
- Net-Neutrality Backers, Telcos Spar Over Stimulus' Broadband Rules ...
- Feds Want Your Help With Broadband Policy
- Broadband Stimulus Plan: How About Some Data First?
- Wired-o-Nomics: Transparency as a Stimulus
- Obama Nominates Net Neutrality Backer for FCC Chief
- Comcast Beginning 'Net Neutrality' Testing
- Obama Campaign Denies Backpedaling on Net Neutrality
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




