Recent Blog Posts
-
A Big Fat Geek Survey
May 25 20123:56 pm EDT -
Phasing Out Instagram
May 25 20122:27 pm EDT -
UberConference Is Victorious!
May 24 20121:49 pm EDT -
Ark Floats, Olive Branch Unseen
May 21 20126:30 pm EDT -
Teach the Internet to Forget
May 21 20124:39 pm EDT -
Microsoft Patent Begs the Question:
Who Needs Developers?
May 17 20123:30 pm EDT -
Mozilla's Monitor-Me-Not
May 17 201211:38 am EDT -
Google's Brain Gets Humanized
May 16 20125:30 pm EDT -
Pandora Demographics Aim Wedding Proposal
May 16 201212:19 pm EDT -
New York Techies Get Mappy Way to Job Hunt
May 15 20122:50 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

Big Bluff From Big Telcos
The feds plan to hand out some $7.2 billion in stimulus grants to companies that will deliver broadband to communities that have none, but Verizon and AT&T are making noises like they won't apply for the money because there are too many strings attached.
That's according to Bloomberg News, and that's hard to believe.
AT&T, Comcast and Verizon -- the nation's largest ISPs -- don't want to have to build networks constrained by so-called 'net neutrality' provisions that would ban them from giving preferential treatment to some services (such as their own streaming video server) over others (such as YouTube).
Congress said the networks had to be open, but left it to the Department of Agriculture and the Commerce Department's National Telecommunications and Information Administration to figure out what openness actually means.
The money being handed out isn't very much for the big operators, though it's simply a bluff for the companies to say they may not be applying for the funds.
They will apply; it's free money, for goodness sake.
The big telcos just want to prove their point -- that they don't want rules attached to their networks ever, even if it's Uncle Sam's dollars that paid for that fiber.
Jealous of billions made by ringtone sellers and search engines, ISPs are tired of just being the transport layer.
So they plan to run their own video services over their network, sell dedicated chunks of it to websites that can afford first-class service, and find other ways to make money with their network besides simply delivering bits to and from other people's computers.
by Ryan Singel for Wired.com
See Also:
- Net-Neutrality Backers, Telcos Spar Over Stimulus' Broadband Rules ...
- Feds Want Your Help With Broadband Policy
- Broadband Stimulus Plan: How About Some Data First?
- Wired-o-Nomics: Transparency as a Stimulus
- Obama Nominates Net Neutrality Backer for FCC Chief
- Comcast Beginning 'Net Neutrality' Testing
- Obama Campaign Denies Backpedaling on Net Neutrality
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





