Recent Blog Posts
-
Where the Tech World Gathers
Feb 10 20125:46 pm EDT -
Obama Blacklisted From Popular New App
Feb 09 20125:20 pm EDT -
Thermostat Startup Nest Comes Out Swinging
Feb 09 201211:46 am EDT -
Apps and Email, Together at Last
Feb 08 20124:30 pm EDT -
The Future Cemetery
Feb 08 201210:15 am EDT -
Open Letter to Congress on SOPA: Take a Breath
Feb 07 20121:00 pm EDT -
Greatest Generation Company Sues iPod Generation Startup Nest
Feb 06 20123:46 pm EDT -
Path Cuts Through Social-Media Noise
Feb 03 201212:10 pm EDT -
Gift Apps That Keep on Giving
Feb 01 20125:19 pm EDT -
A Proxy Piece of the Facebook Pie
Jan 31 20125:00 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

DOJ Ace: Google Dodged Monopoly Lawsuit By Three Hours
Sam Gustin writes: Newsflash: The feds think Google has a monopoly over search advertising. (Ya' think?)
So it's a good thing Google ditched its controversial ad partnership with Yahoo, because the search juggernaut was just three hours away from being sued by the Justice Department, according to the ace antitrust litigator brought on by the feds to investigate the deal.
"We were going to file the complaint at a certain time during the day," Sandy Litvack told AmLawDaily, a legal blog produced by the American Lawyer magazine. "We told them we were going to file the complaint at that time of day. Three hours before, they told us they were abandoning the agreement."
Google had little appetite for a legal battle with the Justice Department, so the company bailed on the plan, leaving Yahoo out to dry.
"We're of course disappointed that this deal won't be moving ahead," Google's top lawyer David Drummond wrote. "But we're not going to let the prospect of a lengthy legal battle distract us from our core mission. That would be like trying to drive down the road of innovation with the parking brake on."
And what a distraction it would have been.
Litvack revealed that the feds were poised to charge Google with violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which prohibits deals that restrain or try to monopolize trade.
"It would have ended up also alleging that Google had a monopoly and that [the Yahoo deal] would have furthered their monopoly," Litvack said.
Litvack played coy when asked whether the Justice Department's willingness to sue Google signals that the company might find itself in the feds' antitrust crosshairs again.
No matter. He didn't really need to come out and say it. It seems clear that if Google continues to grow its search ad market share, it's facing a date with antitrust destiny.
Google may feel lucky to have have dodged a bullet this time. Next time, the company might not so fortunate.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




