Recent Blog Posts
-
A Big Fat Geek Survey
May 25 20123:56 pm EDT -
Phasing Out Instagram
May 25 20122:27 pm EDT -
UberConference Is Victorious!
May 24 20121:49 pm EDT -
Ark Floats, Olive Branch Unseen
May 21 20126:30 pm EDT -
Teach the Internet to Forget
May 21 20124:39 pm EDT -
Microsoft Patent Begs the Question:
Who Needs Developers?
May 17 20123:30 pm EDT -
Mozilla's Monitor-Me-Not
May 17 201211:38 am EDT -
Google's Brain Gets Humanized
May 16 20125:30 pm EDT -
Pandora Demographics Aim Wedding Proposal
May 16 201212:19 pm EDT -
New York Techies Get Mappy Way to Job Hunt
May 15 20122:50 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

Comcast Disclosure Draws Cautious Praise
Sam Gustin writes: Comcast's adversaries in the nearly year-long battle with the cable giant over net neutrality offered cautious praise in response to the company's disclosure of its new network management policies.
The company made the disclosure late Friday night as required by a Federal Communications Commission order sanctioning the company for blocking peer-to-peer traffic on its network.
Comcast acknowledged its policy of blocking peer-to-peer uploads in times of heavy congestion since 2005, and confirmed it will now move to a "protocol agnostic" approach of network management -- a policy it first announced earlier this year. Instead of targeting a particular type of activity -- such as peer-to-peer traffic -- the company will instead focus on users who consume the most bandwidth, and temporarily slow their traffic.
In response, network neutrality advocacy groups offered cautious praise to the company, as well as raised some concerns.
"We're encouraged that Comcast has complied with the F.C.C.'s order in such great detail -- a welcome reversal of the company's past behavior," said Ben Scott, policy director for the Free Press, which filed the original complaint. "This newfound candor is a reminder of the positive impact of F.C.C. oversight."
Noting that Comcast has filed a suit to overturn the F.C.C.'s ruling even as it complies with it, Scott called the appeal a "particular concern since Comcast's filings concede that the company has been blocking peer-to-peer applications in the precise manner that the F.C.C. and independent testers alleged."
Gigi B. Sohn, president and co-founder of Public Knowledge, said: "We appreciate the time and effort Comcast has taken to compile a network management plan. It is a very detailed and very technical document that deserves close scrutiny from the F.C.C. and from private-sector observers. It appears that the plan does not discriminate against any particular protocols and does not involve using Deep Packet Inspection."
But Sohn raised concerns about the company's announced policy of a 250GB monthly cap on bandwidth, as well as other aspects of the company's new plan.
"Will consumers end up paying more for less bandwidth to use?" Sohn asked. "Is it fair to consumers to punish them based on usage lower than the advertised speed?"
One thing is for sure: the days of Comcast locking horns with its adversaries are far from over.
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





