Recent Blog Posts
-
A Big Fat Geek Survey
May 25 20123:56 pm EDT -
Phasing Out Instagram
May 25 20122:27 pm EDT -
UberConference Is Victorious!
May 24 20121:49 pm EDT -
Ark Floats, Olive Branch Unseen
May 21 20126:30 pm EDT -
Teach the Internet to Forget
May 21 20124:39 pm EDT -
Microsoft Patent Begs the Question:
Who Needs Developers?
May 17 20123:30 pm EDT -
Mozilla's Monitor-Me-Not
May 17 201211:38 am EDT -
Google's Brain Gets Humanized
May 16 20125:30 pm EDT -
Pandora Demographics Aim Wedding Proposal
May 16 201212:19 pm EDT -
New York Techies Get Mappy Way to Job Hunt
May 15 20122:50 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

Yang, Bostock Not as Popular as They Thought They Were
Sam Gustin wonders how the Yahoo shareholder tally could possibly have been this screwed up, given that the proxy vote was the most anticipated and scrutinized (supposedly) of the year.
I also find it hard to believe that no one at Yahoo might have thought the vote tally from last Friday's shareholder meeting seemed a little...off. And if someone did notice, one wonders whether the tally would ever have been corrected had Capital Research Global Investors not asked its vote-counter to check their figures.
As it turns out, the numbers were more than "a little" off. In fact, the percentage of shareholders voicing displeasure with Jerry Yang and Roy Bostock was twice what was initially reported.
Sure, you might say, this doesn't change the final result, and just shows that Yang and Bostock are even less popular than previously thought. Newsflash.
But this incident, aside from being yet another black eye for Yahoo, raises some troubling questions:
How did no one at Yahoo notice that tens of millions of votes appeared to be missing from the final tally?
Didn't the company feel it appropriate to do even the most cursory due diligence on the results -- like say, check them against common sense -- given that the future of Yahoo's board was at stake?
Perhaps Yahoo felt the results were "too good to check." Besides, Yahoo and the large shareholders hired outside companies to do such diligence for them. So much for that.
Finally, Did no one at Yahoo question whether the "yes" tallies for Yang and Bostock seemed "a little" high, given widespread investor displeasure over the company's handling of Microsoft's bid?
In the new tally, Yang's "withheld" votes jumped from 14.6 percent to 33.7 percent, while Bostock's "withheld" votes rose from 20.5 percent to 39.5 percent.
In other words, one third of shareholders withheld their support for Yang, while four in ten shareholders shunned Bostock.
Given such a deep level of investor dissatisfaction with Yang and Bostock, they will no doubt face renewed pressure to either perform, or step aside.
The corrected numbers and more, in Yahoo's press release.
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





