Recent Blog Posts
-
msbnc.com "Knows a Trend When it Sees One"
Nov 23 20094:11 pm EDT -
Windows 7 Spin May Be on the Money
Nov 23 20098:44 am EDT -
Mapping Company Raises Millions
Nov 20 20094:09 pm EDT -
Facebook Valuations Are All Over the Map
Nov 20 200911:30 am EDT -
The Future of Tech, 2010 Edition
Nov 20 20099:13 am EDT -
Automatic Pancake-Making Machine Attracts $2 Million in Capital
Nov 19 20094:53 pm EDT -
Apple Talk of Microsoft's Annual Meeting
Nov 19 20091:27 pm EDT -
There Is Still Hope for the News Business
Nov 19 200911:50 am EDT -
The Google Phone May Be Near
Nov 18 20094:10 pm EDT -
Amazon Grocery Service Goes Mobile with iPhone
Nov 18 20099:13 am EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Todd Bishop's Microsoft Blog

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

Network DVRs: Lurching Toward TV On Demand
Kevin Maney writes with anticipation: Thankfully, a federal court ruled in favor of the absolute right-headed logic of allowing cable TV companies to offer so-called "network DVR" services. I'd be ready to sign up on the spot.
This is basically TiVo without the box. Everything happens at the cable company's servers. You want to store episodes of Family Guy to watch later, you click a few remote-control buttons and save them on some hard drive miles away. (I'd guess you might get charged different amounts for different amounts of storage space.)
A bunch of content companies -- Disney, Fox, Universal -- had kneejerk sued Cablevision when it tried to create such a service. The court said no dice -- the service does not violate copyrights. Essentially, consumers are storing their own shows to watch later, vs. the cable company offering them on demand -- in which case Cablevision would've had to pay additional fees for the content. All in all, though the result for viewers is kind of a personal on-demand TV service, without having to own hardware.
Which sounds wonderful to me. It should sound wonderful to cable operators and Verizon and DirecTV, since they can now sell DVR services without putting a box in every home. Oh, hmm, that doesn't sound so hot for box makers, like TiVo, Motorola, Scientific-Atlanta.
. □






