Recent Blog Posts
-
A Big Fat Geek Survey
May 25 20123:56 pm EDT -
Phasing Out Instagram
May 25 20122:27 pm EDT -
UberConference Is Victorious!
May 24 20121:49 pm EDT -
Ark Floats, Olive Branch Unseen
May 21 20126:30 pm EDT -
Teach the Internet to Forget
May 21 20124:39 pm EDT -
Microsoft Patent Begs the Question:
Who Needs Developers?
May 17 20123:30 pm EDT -
Mozilla's Monitor-Me-Not
May 17 201211:38 am EDT -
Google's Brain Gets Humanized
May 16 20125:30 pm EDT -
Pandora Demographics Aim Wedding Proposal
May 16 201212:19 pm EDT -
New York Techies Get Mappy Way to Job Hunt
May 15 20122:50 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

Welcome, Rotten Tech IPO Market
Kevin Maney counters: The news about the crummy tech IPO situation seems to worry a lot of people. But some of the best technology gets built in times like these because there is no quick payoff.
In the past quarter, for the first time in 30 years, not a single tech company went public. So far, that's more of a blip than a trend, There's no reason to belive this situation will last forever. Still, you've got folks like Mark Heesen, president of the National Venture Capital Association, calling the news a "crisis for the start-up community."
Bah. It's a crisis for the kinds of people who do tech start-ups mostly to get rich. Let them move back to Greenwich and become hedge fund managers.
When there's no IPO exit, tech start-ups have to do one of two things: try to get bought by a big company like Cisco or Google, or build an actual, working business with profits and everything. The former is a heck of a risky strategy. The latter tends to push start-ups to spend more time getting it right. Many of the major tech companies were founded in shaky economic times: Microsoft in 1975; Cisco in 1984; MySpace in 2003.
There's another element, too: The cost of starting a company in bad times plummets. Rent is cheaper, computers ditched by some bankrupt start-up can be picked up used, good people can be hired for less. As it is, the cost of starting most kinds of tech companies is one-tenth what it was 10 years ago, because the technology and tools have gotten so much cheaper and more effective.
So a company that needed $5 million just to get off the ground in 1998 now needs maybe $500,000. More and more, that money is being raised from private investors instead of venture capitalists, and the money is more patient -- not pushing so hard for an IPO payday. Again, that's probably better for the long-term prospects of a start-up.
It wouldn't be good if the IPO situation stays this bad for very long, but it's not the end of the world, and it's no worse than when the IPO market is ridiculously hot and people are starting companies with nothing but dollar signs in their eyes.
Laura Rich is a co-founder of Recessionwire, which provides news, advice, perspective and humor about the recession and the recovery.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





