Jun 16 2008
6:38PM
EDT
Even Pirates Will Pay for Music
Sam Gustin raises an eyebrow: Eighty percent of illegal file-swappers would be interested in a paying for a legal file-sharing service that gave them universal access to digital music, according to a new study released Monday.
That statistic, which contradicts the conventional wisdom that digital pirates aren't interested in paying for music, is contained in a study by British Music Rights, an umbrella organization that represents some 50,000 musicians and music publishers in the U.K. Some 773 respondents, aged 14-24, completed the survey.
"It is quite clear that this young and tech-savvy demographic is as crazy about and engaged with music as any previous generation," said Feargal Sharkey, chief executive of British Music Rights. "Contrary to popular belief, they are also prepared to pay for it too. But only if offered the services they want."
The study suggests that in its haste to crack down on illegal file-sharing, the music industry has left an enormous amount of money on the table, and concludes that "offering an access-based approach that enables people to trial, swap, and recommend, music for a [range of] tariff[s] would be successful."
The new data comes amid a furious debate over the future of the music business, as the recording industry casts about for a new business model in the face of rapidly dwindling CD sales and widespread music piracy.
In recent months, all four of the major labels -- Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, Sony/BMG, and EMI -- have been experimenting with new digital distribution schemes, included ad-supported, streaming music services from MySpace and Imeem.
Just last week, Orange, a division of France Telecom, launched a monthly subscription-based music download service in conjunction with the French divisions of all four major record labels. For a flat fee of E12 of per month, users can download up to 500 songs per month from a catalog of over 1 million major label and indie titles.
If the results of the survey are to believed, and a significant majority of music pirates would pay for a legal file-sharing service with universal access to music, the recording industry would be well-advised to pay heed, and give consumers what they want.
That statistic, which contradicts the conventional wisdom that digital pirates aren't interested in paying for music, is contained in a study by British Music Rights, an umbrella organization that represents some 50,000 musicians and music publishers in the U.K. Some 773 respondents, aged 14-24, completed the survey.
"It is quite clear that this young and tech-savvy demographic is as crazy about and engaged with music as any previous generation," said Feargal Sharkey, chief executive of British Music Rights. "Contrary to popular belief, they are also prepared to pay for it too. But only if offered the services they want."
The study suggests that in its haste to crack down on illegal file-sharing, the music industry has left an enormous amount of money on the table, and concludes that "offering an access-based approach that enables people to trial, swap, and recommend, music for a [range of] tariff[s] would be successful."
The new data comes amid a furious debate over the future of the music business, as the recording industry casts about for a new business model in the face of rapidly dwindling CD sales and widespread music piracy.
In recent months, all four of the major labels -- Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, Sony/BMG, and EMI -- have been experimenting with new digital distribution schemes, included ad-supported, streaming music services from MySpace and Imeem.
Just last week, Orange, a division of France Telecom, launched a monthly subscription-based music download service in conjunction with the French divisions of all four major record labels. For a flat fee of E12 of per month, users can download up to 500 songs per month from a catalog of over 1 million major label and indie titles.
If the results of the survey are to believed, and a significant majority of music pirates would pay for a legal file-sharing service with universal access to music, the recording industry would be well-advised to pay heed, and give consumers what they want.
See more in
Recent Blog Posts
- Smartphone Growth Slowing
- Dec 4 2008 3:05PM EST
- iPhone Gets an Amazon App
- Dec 4 2008 2:25PM EST
- Barack Obama Uses a Zune
- Dec 4 2008 1:30PM EST
- DOJ Ace: Google Dodged Monopoly Lawsuit By Three Hours
- Dec 4 2008 12:15PM EST
- First Bytes: AT&T, Obama, Sony, Microsoft, Spam
- Dec 4 2008 10:14AM EST
- Last Bytes: Cyber Monday, iPhone, YouTube, more
- Dec 3 2008 6:00PM EST
- Update: Miller NOT Gunning for Yahoo
- Dec 3 2008 4:42PM EST
- A Look Inside A Facebook for the Filthy Rich
- Dec 3 2008 4:03PM EST
- Yahoo Cedes Music Webcasting to CBS
- Dec 3 2008 3:00PM EST
- Telecoms, Advocacy Groups Unite Over Broadband "Stimulus"
- Dec 3 2008 1:53PM EST
- A Tweet Time with Ev Williams
- Dec 3 2008 12:54PM EST
- First Bytes: RIM, Yahoo, Twitter, Facebook, Apple
- Dec 3 2008 9:54AM EST
- Miller-Time for Yahoo?
- Dec 2 2008 9:06PM EST
- Last Bytes: Google, Dell, Classifieds, Face Recognition Software
- Dec 2 2008 4:51PM EST
- DVR Commercial Skipping: Like Rocks On a Pond?
- Dec 2 2008 12:10PM EST
Categories
Links
- Mark Cuban's blog

- TechCrunch

- GigaOM

- Engadget

- USA TODAY Tech

- Romenesko

- BuzzTracker Tech

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- Maney's band on MySpace

- Spiedies, mmmm

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- Tom Foremski

- Fred Wilson

- Pandora

- SciTech Daily

- Todd Bishop's Microsoft Blog

- Steven Johnson

- The Long Tail

- paidContent

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Marc Andreessen

- Kevin's site

- Kevin Maney & His Briefs on CD Baby










