Recent Blog Posts
-
Mapping Company Raises Millions
Nov 20 20094:09 pm EDT -
Facebook Valuations Are All Over the Map
Nov 20 200911:30 am EDT -
The Future of Tech, 2010 Edition
Nov 20 20099:13 am EDT -
Automatic Pancake-Making Machine Attracts $2 Million in Capital
Nov 19 20094:53 pm EDT -
Apple Talk of Microsoft's Annual Meeting
Nov 19 20091:27 pm EDT -
There Is Still Hope for the News Business
Nov 19 200911:50 am EDT -
The Google Phone May Be Near
Nov 18 20094:10 pm EDT -
Amazon Grocery Service Goes Mobile with iPhone
Nov 18 20099:13 am EDT -
How Microsoft Blew It in Mobile
Nov 17 20093:55 pm EDT -
Ten Reasons Why Startups Fail
Nov 17 20092:18 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Todd Bishop's Microsoft Blog

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

Starbucks Looking for Ideas Via Social Networking
Starbucks is turning to social networking and hoping its customers will help it out of its current slump.
But maybe Starbucks has a problem it can't solve with technology or anything else. I had lunch the other day with iconoclastic economist and author Tyler Cowen. We got talking about Starbucks, which Cowen suggested has been so successful in large part because of an aura it created -- not because it ever had better coffee. Starbucks was a cool new thing, he said, and it grew rapidly to take advantage of that image. But the rapid growth now becomes Starbucks very undoing -- because by definition, if you're huge and omnipresent, you can no longer be the cool new thing.
"Starbucks has gone from being Apple to being Applebees," Cowen said. "Lots of people go to Applebees, but no one thinks it's cool to go to Applebees."
Interesting side question to Cowen's comments: Is Apple's success built on an aura, or is it built on actually being better?
. □






