Recent Blog Posts
-
A Big Fat Geek Survey
May 25 20123:56 pm EDT -
Phasing Out Instagram
May 25 20122:27 pm EDT -
UberConference Is Victorious!
May 24 20121:49 pm EDT -
Ark Floats, Olive Branch Unseen
May 21 20126:30 pm EDT -
Teach the Internet to Forget
May 21 20124:39 pm EDT -
Microsoft Patent Begs the Question:
Who Needs Developers?
May 17 20123:30 pm EDT -
Mozilla's Monitor-Me-Not
May 17 201211:38 am EDT -
Google's Brain Gets Humanized
May 16 20125:30 pm EDT -
Pandora Demographics Aim Wedding Proposal
May 16 201212:19 pm EDT -
New York Techies Get Mappy Way to Job Hunt
May 15 20122:50 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

What the Movie Industry Won't Tell You About Its Just-out Numbers
The MPAA just released a major report on the movie industry's 2007 performance, and most of the spin is positive. Box office sales climbed to $9.6 billion, the MPAA points out, a 5% increase that reflects a healthy industry.
But look a little deeper and the increase vanishes. The movie industry in general is fine because of other outlets, like DVD sales. The theatrical movie business, though, is not so pretty. The movie theater experience is simply not so much better than watching at home that it lures people out the way it used to.
First of all, the 5% increase is entirely because of price increases. The number of actual theater visits stayed exactly the same from 2006 to 2007: 1.4 billion, the MPAA report says. And the same report starkly shows that theater prices increased 5% in 2007. Considering rising population figures, movies are bringing in less per person than a year ago.
The report doesn't show the number of theater screens in existence. For that, you have to go to the National Association of Theater Owners, which reports that the number of screens has been rising. (Though 2007 figures aren't out yet.) This means that movies are bringing in less per screen than they used to.
At the same time, the average cost of making a film is up to $106 million in 2007, vs. $100 million the year before.
All in all, it's not a great economic model: costs are rising, the addressable market and number of outlets are rising, yet revenue is staying flat.
The MPAA insists that technology isn't to blame. Part of the report shows that consumers who own five or more media technologies (only 14% of the population) see way more movies than consumers who have less than five. The numbers aren't broken down further, but I suspect there might be more to it than the MPAA shows. People who own lots of media technology are generally voracious media consumers and have more discretionary income, and might tend to go to more movies anyway.
The average Joe who has a DVD player and a nice TV is apparently not going to a ton of movies.
. □
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





