Recent Blog Posts
-
MSNBC.com "Knows a Trend When It Sees One"
Nov 23 20094:11 pm EDT -
Windows 7 Spin May Be on the Money
Nov 23 20098:44 am EDT -
Mapping Company Raises Millions
Nov 20 20094:09 pm EDT -
Facebook Valuations Are All Over the Map
Nov 20 200911:30 am EDT -
The Future of Tech, 2010 Edition
Nov 20 20099:13 am EDT -
Automatic Pancake-Making Machine Attracts $2 Million in Capital
Nov 19 20094:53 pm EDT -
Apple Talk of Microsoft's Annual Meeting
Nov 19 20091:27 pm EDT -
There Is Still Hope for the News Business
Nov 19 200911:50 am EDT -
The Google Phone May Be Near
Nov 18 20094:10 pm EDT -
Amazon Grocery Service Goes Mobile with iPhone
Nov 18 20099:13 am EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Todd Bishop's Microsoft Blog

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

San Francisco and the Wisdom of Grassroots Wi-Fi
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom has been determined for a while now to cover the city in Wi-Fi. After starts and stops with Google and Earthlink, today the mayor said he's getting behind a city-wide Wi-Fi effort by start-up Meraki -- which, incidentally, is partly funded by Google.
Meraki's approach sounds something like that of Madrid-based FON, except that FON seems to have hit on a formula that's catching fire in many parts of the world. FON sells little wireless routers specifically built to share a Wi-Fi signal. You buy one for about $22, use it as the wireless router in your home, and allow anyone who wanders into range to use your signal too. In exchange, you get to use the Wi-Fi from anyone else's FON router for free. It combines self-interest with public good. If enough people buy FON routers, FON participants could get free Wi-Fi almost anywhere.
This makes for a bottom-up, grassroots Wi-Fi network partially owned and maintained by the people who use it -- which seems a much more likely way to get these city systems built vs. contracting with a company to build a system from the top-down.
Then the question is: Why would SF go with an unproven start-up that's sort-of copying FON...instead of with FON itself?
. □






