Recent Blog Posts
-
A Big Fat Geek Survey
May 25 20123:56 pm EDT -
Phasing Out Instagram
May 25 20122:27 pm EDT -
UberConference Is Victorious!
May 24 20121:49 pm EDT -
Ark Floats, Olive Branch Unseen
May 21 20126:30 pm EDT -
Teach the Internet to Forget
May 21 20124:39 pm EDT -
Microsoft Patent Begs the Question:
Who Needs Developers?
May 17 20123:30 pm EDT -
Mozilla's Monitor-Me-Not
May 17 201211:38 am EDT -
Google's Brain Gets Humanized
May 16 20125:30 pm EDT -
Pandora Demographics Aim Wedding Proposal
May 16 201212:19 pm EDT -
New York Techies Get Mappy Way to Job Hunt
May 15 20122:50 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

- TechFlash

Motorola: Maybe the Problem Isn't Zander
When I thought about it for 2 seconds, I realized that Motorola has been kind of a well-disguised mess for a long time. Ed Zander, who said today he's stepping down as Motorola CEO, certainly didn't create the mess. The main criticism he deserves is that he didn't ultimately fix the mess. I wonder if anybody can.
The company has had five CEOs in 20 years: Robert Galvin (as son of the founder, Bob Galvin built the modern Motorola into a major company); George Fisher, Gary Tooker, Chris Galvin (son of Robert) and Zander. That in itself suggests a problem. These are not untalented men.
I was looking at Moto's stock history over that period. The company had two brief but remarkable runs. The first was from around 1990 to 1993 -- Fisher's years. The company rode the boom in pagers and was building many of the first cell phone systems. The stock went from $4.50 (split adjusted) in 1990 to $16 in '93. Great. Yet for the three years before (1987-90) the stock went up a total of $1 a share, and for the three years after (1993-96) it also went up just $1.
From 1996 to 1999, Moto had its other great run -- this time, riding the StarTAC phone and the cell phone boom, and of course the general tech and telecom stock craze. StarTAC came out in '96. Cell phone use in the US alone went from 5.2 million in 1990 to 55.3 million in 1997. (It's about 225 million now.) Moto stock, about $18 in November 1996, shot to nearly $40 three years later.
Then -- another bust. The stock dove to $11 in 2002. It climbed back to around $25 on the strength of the RAZR in 2005, and dropped off when Moto couldn't follow up the RAZR with another hit. Now the stock is around $16.
So basically, in 20 years Moto has had two hit products: StarTAC and the RAZR. It has had one truly major new product line: cell phones.
In the meantime, each CEO has gone through huge strategic blunders. Under Fisher, Motorola launched the Iridium satellite project -- now seen as a business boondoggle on a magnitude of Ford's Edsel. Under Tooker and Galvin, it missed the transition from analog cell phones to digital. Under Zander, it missed the transition from plain old cell phones to smart phones. Along the way, Motorola got into a bunch of stuff that didn't pan out so well, like the PowerPC chips and smart cards.
These past 20 years paint Motorola as a boom and bust company -- big swings, a lot of strikeouts, a couple home runs. Apparently, it's going to get rid of any CEO who whiffs a few times. Doesn't leave much time for fixing the mess.
Good luck to the new guy, Greg Brown. He's going to need it.
. □
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





