Recent Blog Posts
-
Former Expedia Execs Plan Travel Startup
Mar 22 20106:30 am EDT -
March Madness Hogs Bandwidth
Mar 19 20104:30 pm EDT -
Google to Announce China Exit on Monday, Report Says
Mar 19 201011:55 am EDT -
Viacom, Google Trade Accusations in Suit
Mar 19 20107:45 am EDT -
Sex.com Sale Delayed
Mar 18 20104:05 pm EDT -
Stern Warning
Mar 18 20101:26 pm EDT -
Google Teams With Sony, Intel to Build a TV
Mar 18 201011:48 am EDT -
Amazon Plays Hardball With Publishers, Releases Kindle for Mac
Mar 18 20107:30 am EDT -
Facebook Pays $9.5 Million in Privacy Suit
Mar 17 20104:10 pm EDT -
Macs Cost Less to Maintain Than Windows PCs
Mar 17 20101:00 pm EDT
Links
- Engadget

- Pandora

- GigaOM

- USA TODAY Tech

- Todd Bishop's Microsoft Blog

- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list

- BuzzTracker Tech

- The Long Tail

- Tom Foremski

- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den

- John Battelle's SearchBlog

- Mark Cuban's blog

- SciTech Daily

- Romenesko

- Kevin Maney's site

- Steven Johnson

- Marc Andreessen

- TechCrunch

- Fred Wilson

- paidContent

- Spiedies, mmmm

Why Did Parental Control of Cell Phones Take So Long?
Talk about a long overdue development in the cell phone industry: AT&T today launches a service that lets parents set limits and boundaries on their kids' cell phones. Parents now can have control over when a phone can get calls, how many text messages can be sent, and what can be downloaded.
This kind of parental control has been needed for at least the past five years, as more families buy cell phones for their teenage kids. To any parent with a cell phoned teenager, it's also pretty apparent why the carriers have dragged their feet to do this: It will cut down on the carriers' revenue. Teens tend to make a habit of vastly exceeding their text messaging plans and downloading multiple music videos and ring tones, resulting in whopping extra charges on the monthly bill. So AT&T is no doubt doing this because it thinks customers want parental controls badly enough that they will switch carriers to get it. Otherwise, it's a money-losing proposition.
. □






