Recent Blog Posts
-
MSNBC.com "Knows a Trend When It Sees One"
Nov 23 20094:11 pm EDT -
Windows 7 Spin May Be on the Money
Nov 23 20098:44 am EDT -
Mapping Company Raises Millions
Nov 20 20094:09 pm EDT -
Facebook Valuations Are All Over the Map
Nov 20 200911:30 am EDT -
The Future of Tech, 2010 Edition
Nov 20 20099:13 am EDT -
Automatic Pancake-Making Machine Attracts $2 Million in Capital
Nov 19 20094:53 pm EDT -
Apple Talk of Microsoft's Annual Meeting
Nov 19 20091:27 pm EDT -
There Is Still Hope for the News Business
Nov 19 200911:50 am EDT -
The Google Phone May Be Near
Nov 18 20094:10 pm EDT -
Amazon Grocery Service Goes Mobile with iPhone
Nov 18 20099:13 am EDT
Links
- Engadget
- Pandora
- GigaOM
- USA TODAY Tech
- Todd Bishop's Microsoft Blog
- Somewhat Frank's tech conference list
- BuzzTracker Tech
- The Long Tail
- Tom Foremski
- Roger McGuinn's Folk Den
- John Battelle's SearchBlog
- Mark Cuban's blog
- SciTech Daily
- Romenesko
- Kevin Maney's site
- Steven Johnson
- Marc Andreessen
- TechCrunch
- Fred Wilson
- paidContent
- Spiedies, mmmm
Why Did Parental Control of Cell Phones Take So Long?
Talk about a long overdue development in the cell phone industry: AT&T today launches a service that lets parents set limits and boundaries on their kids' cell phones. Parents now can have control over when a phone can get calls, how many text messages can be sent, and what can be downloaded.
This kind of parental control has been needed for at least the past five years, as more families buy cell phones for their teenage kids. To any parent with a cell phoned teenager, it's also pretty apparent why the carriers have dragged their feet to do this: It will cut down on the carriers' revenue. Teens tend to make a habit of vastly exceeding their text messaging plans and downloading multiple music videos and ring tones, resulting in whopping extra charges on the monthly bill. So AT&T is no doubt doing this because it thinks customers want parental controls badly enough that they will switch carriers to get it. Otherwise, it's a money-losing proposition.
. □
