Recent Blog Posts
-
SNL Strives to Keep Election Momentum
Nov 12 200812:00 am EDT -
The Dawn of a New Night Shyamalan
Oct 30 20082:48 pm EDT -
Icahn Double Feature: A Yahoo-Lions Gate Deal?
Oct 22 20086:00 pm EDT -
NBC Tries to Copy Fox Hero Worship
Oct 22 200812:00 am EDT -
Can W Succeed Even Though W Failed?
Oct 16 20087:02 am EDT -
Paul Newman's Tasty Legacy
Oct 01 20082:30 pm EDT -
Tough Times, Even in Tinseltown
Sep 24 20088:00 pm EDT -
New Life for a New Line Movie
Sep 19 200812:00 am EDT -
New to Hollywood? Watch Your Wallet.
Sep 11 200812:00 am EDT -
Superheroes Save Hollywood! (Barely.)
Sep 03 20081:15 pm EDT
Sink or Swim? Another Hollywood Boat Sails
Steve Carrell in Evan Almighty. Photograph by Universal/courtesy Everett Collection
Last year, the Wisconsin hedge fund Stark Investments lost a boatload of money on the Warner Bros. remake Poseidon, about a luxury oceanliner capsized by a rogue wave.
Today, another Stark-backed ship movie sets sail: the Universal Pictures comedy Evan Almighty, starring Steven Carell as a Congressman who is ordered by God to build an ark.
Negative buzz surrounding Evan Almighty's big budget and muddled marketing campaign raises a question Portfolio.com has asked before: How many movies must drown before Stark goes looking for a lifeboat?
As reported on Portfolio.com on June 15, Stark is a major investor in a $700 million film financing fund called Gun Hill II, a 19-picture deal with Universal Pictures and Sony Pictures. Evan Almighty is a Gun Hill II picture, and according to at least one Hollywood blogger, Nikki Finke, it may not float.
Finke reports this week that Evan Almighty's hefty $210 million budget means it must do $500 million in worldwide ticket sales to make a profit.
(Universal execs counter that the budget is only $175 million, and that the lack of first-dollar gross participants means the movie will be in profit after $250 million in ticket sales).
That can't be welcome news to Stark, whose executives cite a policy that prohibits commenting to the press about investments. Condé Nast Portfolio reported in May 2007 that when Gun Hill II was brokered last year by Ryan Kavanaugh, a 32-year-old middleman, he convinced Stark to buy into the deal's riskiest slice -- the so-called equity layer.
According to two people familiar with the terms of the Gun Hill II deal, Stark stands to lose more than $60 million if its movies don't perform.
by Amy Wallace
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




