Recent Blog Posts
-
Two Tech Blogs Now One
Feb 08 20123:14 pm EDT -
News Startup Pivots Toward B2B
Feb 08 201211:23 am EDT -
Walls Fall Down at Thrillist
Feb 07 20124:43 pm EDT -
Textbook Case: A Startup That Does Good
Feb 06 20125:46 pm EDT -
Top 10 Buzziest Super Bowl Ads
Feb 06 201212:04 pm EDT -
Arianna: No Regrets on AOL Deal Anniversary
Feb 03 20129:48 am EDT -
Startups as Sitcoms? Try These Shows
Jan 31 20124:37 pm EDT -
Reed Hastings Catches a Break
Jan 26 20129:18 am EDT -
Murdoch-Backed Beyond Oblivion Fails to Launch, Files for Bankruptcy
Jan 25 20124:30 pm EDT -
Seacrest and Cuban Venture: Like Entrepreneurial PB&J
Jan 19 20125:56 pm EDT
Links
-

- Jim Romenesko, Poynter Institute

- Michael Calderone, Politico

- Jeff Bercovici, AOL Daily Finance

- The New York Observer Media Vertical

- Press Box, Slate's Jack Shafer

- Memo Pad, Women's Wear Daily

- Don't Quote Me, The Boston Phoenix's Adam Reilly

- Media Decoder, The New York Times

- Media Memo, All Things Digital's Peter Kafka

- The Media Guy, Ad Age's Simon Dumenco

- L.A. Observed

- Fine on Media, BusinessWeek

- Deadline Hollywood Daily

- Tuned In, Time Magazine

- TV Tattle

- TV by the Numbers

- Gawker

- The Huffington Post Media Vertical

- Editor and Publisher

- PaidContent

The Descent of Men's Magazines
Today's New York Post features a Page Six item about a $40 million hostile takeover bid for Maxim magazine being made by Andrew Fox, CEO of something called Track Entertainment. Page Six hints at the fact that this offer should be taken with a grain of salt since a spokesperson for the magazine told them, "We have received no offer, and there is no negotiation."
But that doesn't mean that a seemingly ludicrous offer (or, um, non-offer) from a company no one's really heard of (Track's website says it "connects brands and consumers through events, television, digital media, and lifestyle marketing," whatever that means) can't spark a new round of speculation at the future of men's magazines, a genre that has been in a long, slow decline for at least a decade.
Earlier this month, Bloomberg's Serena Saitto and Lauren Coleman-Lochner reported that Playboy was considering selling itself to Iconix Brand Group, owners of Candie's shows and London Fog. A figure of $300 million was floated out, a pretty high valuation for the 56-year-old magazine and lifestyle brand. The company reported revenue of $56 million in the third quarter, down from $70.4 million in the second, according to paidContent's Rafat Ali. The magazine recently laid off 25 people as it outsourced all its publishing operations to AMI to offset costs. Unless Iconix wanted to ignore the magazine—or leave it as a loss leader, as it seems to be now—and focus on apparel and other ventures, that seems like a lot to pay for a magazine whose circulation has fallen and which hasn't packed much cultural cache since before most of its models were born.
Like Playboy, Maxim was once the market leader in the men's magazine genre—for better or for worse, depending on your individual tolerance for scantily clad CW starlets—but has had a bad few years. The current majority owner of the magazine's parent company, Alpha Group, is Cereberus Capital Management, which bought out the Quadrangle Group in July, according to a report from the New York Post's Keith Kelly. The magazine has lost 33.5 percent of its advertising this year, according to a MediaDailyNews post from Erik Sass from May. Joe Levy, late of Alpha's folded music magazine Blender, was appointed editor in chief of the magazine in March, the ninth editor the magazine has had since launching in the U.S. in 1997. Several high-profile layoffs followed in April. Stuff, Maxim's kid-brother magazine, was folded in 2007.
Maxim and Playboy aren't the only men's magazines feeling a little less secure right now. GQ's ad pages declined 32 percent this year (again according to MDN), and like other Condé Nast titles, the magazine has had to lay off employees in the last few months, as did its brother publication, Details. (Disclosure: Portfolio.com is owned by American City Business Journals, a division of Advance Publications, owners of Condé Nast.) Esquire has been resorting to increasingly gimmicky ideas—augmented reality! mix-and-match covers! digital covers!—to get attention. It's almost as if the whole men's magazine genre is going through a late-life crisis.
Andrew Fox, the guy who wants to buy Maxim, told Page Six, "My vision is to make Maxim a must-have again, using event production, website development, e-commerce, and digital marketing and online programming. I am trying to take a strong brand and give it legs for the future. I would take the magazine and all its digital properties and make it into a $300 million business again."
That sure sounds ambitious! And a bit vague.
But with media industry's current malaise—did Fox happen to read David Carr's rather downbeat Media Equation column in today's New York Times?—and what looks like a genre-deflating decline of men's magazines, it also seems pretty futile.
Matt Haber is the media blogger for Portfolio.com.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




