Recent Blog Posts
-
Signpost Makes Deal With Newspaper Biggies
May 23 20122:14 pm EDT -
The Ghosts of AOL Past
May 22 20124:30 pm EDT -
Copy Me Big
May 22 20122:10 pm EDT -
Aaron Sorkin Takes on Steve Jobs Project
May 16 20123:45 pm EDT -
Fairchild Puts Its Money on Fashion Bloggers
May 15 20121:26 pm EDT -
Ziff Davis Adds Tech Review Site to Shopping Cart
May 14 201211:37 am EDT -
Mozilla and Knight Back Crowdsourced Video Translator
May 10 20122:37 pm EDT -
TechCrunch Staying Put
May 09 20122:31 pm EDT -
Are You Wiki-Worthy?
May 04 20125:02 pm EDT -
Arianna Huffington Back Where She Started
May 04 201210:02 am EDT
Links
-

- Jim Romenesko, Poynter Institute

- Michael Calderone, Politico

- Jeff Bercovici, AOL Daily Finance

- The New York Observer Media Vertical

- Press Box, Slate's Jack Shafer

- Memo Pad, Women's Wear Daily

- Don't Quote Me, The Boston Phoenix's Adam Reilly

- Media Decoder, The New York Times

- Media Memo, All Things Digital's Peter Kafka

- The Media Guy, Ad Age's Simon Dumenco

- L.A. Observed

- Fine on Media, BusinessWeek

- Deadline Hollywood Daily

- Tuned In, Time Magazine

- TV Tattle

- TV by the Numbers

- Gawker

- The Huffington Post Media Vertical

- Editor and Publisher

- PaidContent

Deadline for Google Books Agreement Looms
With less than a week left for authors to opt-out of the Google Book Search Settlement, Vanityfair.com's Jennifer Massoni looks at the pros and cons of the $125 million class action settlement for authors and publishers whose works have been digitized by the search engine company.
Authors can choose not to participate in the settlement—giving up the small potential payouts of between $60 to $300 dollars—and reserve the right to sue Google on their own.
Massoni quotes one literary agent who says, "As far as I’m concerned, all of this is corrupt racketeering... Publishers like it because they’ll take money from anywhere. But it rips off the authors by interposing too many clueless intermediaries.”
The settlement has some powerful opponents. William Morris Endeavor has advised its clients to opt-out. Microsoft, Amazon, and Yahoo!—probably sensing Google's potential for digital book search domination—also opposed the settlement and have joined an advocacy group called the Open Book Alliance.
Another critic, Forbes.com's Steve Pociask, compares the settlement to a burglar cutting a deal to "use the stolen contents for as long as he wants, provided he pays each victim a one-time fee per item."
Google, for its part, is putting a typically utopian spin on their project. Sergey Brin, the company's co-founder and president of technology said in a statement, "While this agreement is a real win-win for all of us, the real victors are all the readers. The tremendous wealth of knowledge that lies within the books of the world will now be at their fingertips." And so will Google, which will probably make real wealth off that "wealth of knowledge" with its AdSense.
The deadline for copyright holders to opt-out is September 4.
Matt Haber is the media blogger for Portfolio.com.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





