Recent Blog Posts
-
The Little Black Envelope
Feb 09 20102:27 pm EDT -
Super Bowl Surpasses M*A*S*H
Feb 08 20103:01 pm EDT -
The Management of Waste
Feb 08 20101:04 pm EDT -
Pining Over Playboy
Feb 05 20105:08 pm EDT -
The Other Kind of iPad
Jan 27 20107:23 pm EDT -
Top-Grossing Avatar Puts Murdoch in Unfamiliar Position
Jan 26 20101:31 pm EDT -
Super Bowl Ad Sparks Abortion Battle
Jan 26 201012:52 pm EDT -
NBC Says Goodnight to Conan
Jan 21 201012:38 pm EDT -
Scams for Gold
Jan 20 201010:13 am EDT -
Mark Burnett's Producers Are No Geniuses
Jan 08 20102:52 pm EDT
Links
-

- Jim Romenesko, Poynter Institute

- Michael Calderone, Politico

- Jeff Bercovici, AOL Daily Finance

- The New York Observer Media Vertical

- Press Box, Slate's Jack Shafer

- Memo Pad, Women's Wear Daily

- Don't Quote Me, The Boston Phoenix's Adam Reilly

- Media Decoder, The New York Times

- Media Memo, All Things Digital's Peter Kafka

- The Media Guy, Ad Age's Simon Dumenco

- L.A. Observed

- Fine on Media, BusinessWeek

- Deadline Hollywood Daily

- Tuned In, Time Magazine

- TV Tattle

- TV by the Numbers

- Gawker

- The Huffington Post Media Vertical

- Editor and Publisher

- PaidContent

The Times Will Serve No Brand Extension Before Its Time
Let's say you're an executive at a very established—but financially challenged—east coast newspaper that's sometimes accused of being elitist by pundits on the right. You're looking for a brand extension to create an additional revenue stream for your paper, which had a slightly better-than-expected second quarter, but is still struggling with declining ads and the Web eating away at it. This thing has to be irresistible to your readers, something that flatters them for having the good taste to read your established east coast newspaper, and compliments their lifestyle.
Oh, and it should play into every possible stereotype held against you and them, practically handing your critics ammunition for the latest round of cheap shots against you. Can one product do both those things at once?
Introducing the New York Times Wine Club.
According to an un-bylined piece in today's paper (and, really what writer would want his or her name attached to a piece of semi-naked shilling), the New York Times Company "will offer members a selection of wines at two price levels, $90 or $180 per six-bottle shipment, and customers can choose to have wine delivered every one, two or three months."
The Wall Street Journal, the San Francisco Chronicle, Sunset Magazine and Forbes all have similar clubs, and according to Thomas K. Carley, the Times Company senior vice president of strategic planning, “The Times is looking at a lot of different ideas for engaging our audience." And, it would seem, engaging its detractors by opening up new joke streams. (Really, why didn't the Times launch its own artisanal cheese club? Perhaps a nice green latte maker? Maybe a socialist indoctrination summer camp for kids? These bad jokes practically write themselves...)
"Wine-drinking liberal" is more or less the go-to taunt from Conservatives who wish to portray Democrats and progressives as out of touch or overly fancified. In fact, Democratic candidates deemed too effete or progressive are often tagged as "wine-track candidates, like Bill Bradley and John Kerry—the latter, a veritable poster boy for Democratic wine-sipping—by Time's Joe Klein when they endorsed Barack Obama for president in 2008.
If the Times wanted to avoid all that, they could've created their own beer. Now that would've play up their non-elitist bona fides. And imagine if President Obama served Brew York Times at his next beer summit: It could open a whole new genre of news product placement.
Besides, a Times-branded beer would tap (ha?) the 42 percent of Americans who told Gallup they prefer beer over wine and liquor in 2008: This thing could be big. Billy Beer big! Just don't let a couple of moonlighting political reporters make a Web video promoting it: The would be a very bad idea.
Matt Haber is the media blogger for Portfolio.com.






