Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

It's Just a Recession
In this week's Off the Charts column, NYT's Floyd Norris describes how the young and old are having a very different experience so far in this one-year-old recession:
There are now more jobs than there were a year ago for every group over 55 years of age -- and fewer jobs for every group under 55.
What accounts for this?
The difference reflects the fact many more older people want jobs. The labor force -- defined as those who have jobs or are looking for them -- has grown rapidly among those who have reached the ages at which many traditionally retire. Now, with their 401(k) plan assets down sharply in value and their homes also worth less than they had been, many people are putting off retirement or seeking to return to work.
But I think Norris is reading a little too deeply into the numbers. Another way to examine these trends is to look at the employment-population ratio, which is particularly important given that whole Graying of America thing.
The following chart plots the change in the E-P ratio between November '07 and '08 for the same age groups Norris uses in his chart. A positive reading means that job growth is outpacing population growth while a negative number means that employment is falling behind.
This tells pretty much the same story as Norris: younger workers are suffering while older ones are staying above water. The only difference is that the 55 to 64 age group is down, not up.
But let's see what happened in recessions past. The following chart also throws in year-over-year E-P ratio changes for November '90 and '01. (And I will admit that I'm sticking with Novembers out of laziness.)
The patterns look pretty similar, so the next logical question: Does this only happen during recessions?
This chart also adds y-o-y changes for '87, '98, and '05 -- all of which were expansion years and happened three years before a downturns:
So, it looks like the discrepancy in how different age groups are being affected by the current recession is likely more a function of what part of the business cycle we're passing through than anything unique to our era.






