Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

The End of Reserve Requirements?
According to the Congressional Budget Office, as part of the bailout package the Fed will be allowed to pay interest on reserves banks keep at the Fed. The CBO says the Fed can start as soon as October 1, but since the bailout won't be signed into law until the end of this week at the earliest, interest payments won't be legal until after the 1st.
Congress had already approved payments, but the Fed couldn't start until 2011. In April, former WSJ reporter Greg Ip laid out why the Fed wants to pay interest:
by using open market purchases and sales of securities, the Fed adjusts the quantity of reserves banks hold and thus the interest rate they charge on excess reserves banks lend to each other (the federal funds rate). But since required reserves earn no interest, they are a tax, and like all taxes, create distortions. Over time banks minimized the portion of their deposit base subject to requirements and met a growing proportion of the remaining requirement through currency in their vaults rather than cash on deposit with the Fed. The Fed worried thatDavid VanHoose of Baylor University thinks, ironically, that interest payments on reverses will pave the way for the elimination of reserve requirements:
eventually required reserves would be so low it would have trouble implementing monetary policy. If banks earned interest on reserves, these problems would be mitigated.
The receipt of interest on reserves will reduce the incentive for depository institutions to economize on reserves. Depository institutions already avoid a considerable portion of the reserve-requirement "tax" through the use of sweep accounts. Consequently, ending or at least scaling back the present reserve requirement regime could have fairly small effects on total reserve balances at Federal Reserve banks. At the same time, significant cuts in reserve requirements would remove much of the incentive to incur wasteful resource costs required to maintain sweep arrangements.Sweep accounts are set up to:
"sweep" funds from transactions deposit accounts into savings accounts and thereby reduce required reserves of depository institutions....in 1994, balances in sweep accounts were slightly over $5 billion. Today sweep account balances exceed $760 billion, which amounts to more than 55 percent of the M1 measure of the U.S. money stock.






