Intrade Statement on Trading Discrepancy
After questions were raised here and elsewhere about the discrepancy between Intrade prices and those of other prediction markets over the outcome of the presidential elections, the company issued this statement (emphasis mine):
Periodically we become aware of differences between the market prices on some of our markets with the same markets on other platforms.Typically these differences are small, and rarely after accounting for transaction costs do they offer significant $ arbitrage opportunity.
Currently there exists a larger than usual difference between Intrade and others on some of the 2008 US presidential election markets, particularly Barak Obama and John McCain.
It is unclear what caused these particularly discrepancies. It has been suggested that arbitrage opportunities persisting for any meaningful period of time is a sign of a young industry.
I also called up Chad Rigetti, Intrade's VP of business development for some further insight. He added, plausibly, that the growing popularity of Intrade this election cycle means there are more eyes looking for discrepancies:
"The attention that our markets have gotten over this election cycle has been up, in terms of volume, by a factor of eight over the last election" in 2004, Rigetti said. So far, there's been over $18 million bet on the Obama, McCain, and Clinton presidential contracts combined.
There's no doubt that prediction markets are slowly creeping into the mainstream. A surprising number of media outlets reported on Intrade's bailout contract showing the probability that the $700 billion Treasury package will pass (which is right now 91 percent).
As for the suspicious trading patterns identified by Nate Silver yesterday, Rigetti had no comment.
In other Intrade news, they have a new market on whether the presidential debate will take place tomorrow or not after John McCain tried to beg out. According to the traders that have bet so far, the Republican nominee better start preparing:
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile- The Year in Research
- Dec 31 2008 9:13AM EST
- Mind Your Value Judgements
- Dec 19 2008 7:52PM EST
- S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
- Dec 19 2008 3:45PM EST
- Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
- Dec 19 2008 2:31PM EST
- Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
- Dec 18 2008 8:57PM EST
- House Price Bubble Deflated?
- Dec 18 2008 5:57PM EST
- Where Were the Whistleblowers?
- Dec 16 2008 11:03PM EST
- It's Just a Recession
- Dec 13 2008 10:20PM EST
- Comparing American and European Unemployment Insurance
- Dec 12 2008 7:46PM EST
- Back to Normal?
- Dec 11 2008 4:33PM EST
- Chart of the Day: Japan Under Quantitative Easing
- Dec 10 2008 4:11PM EST
- Don't Cry for Capitalism
- Dec 9 2008 4:13PM EST
- Can We Remember the Pain of Bubbles Past?
- Dec 8 2008 4:58PM EST
- The Pain to Come
- Dec 5 2008 6:04PM EST
- The Lending Standards Red Herring
- Dec 4 2008 3:34PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog








