Sep 21 2008
11:20PM
EDT
A Market Price for Subprime CDOs
Back in July, Merrill Lynch took the bold step of admitting that a significant portion of its holdings were worth a lot less than it had previously acknowledged.
It sold roughly $31 billion worth of mortgage-linked CDOs to investment management firm Lone Star at $0.22 on the dollar for a total of $6.7 billion. This deal has popped up in recent coverage of the events of last week in both the WSJ and NYT as Merrill was forced to sell itself to Bank of America.
The proposed bill by the Treasury Department says that the initial $700 billion in bailout funds would be used to buy "mortgage-related assets." It's hard to say how much of what Wall St. firms want to get off their books is in CDO form, but you'd have to bet that a significant portion of it is just that.
Hopefully, the political jockeying over the bailout will lead to a much more transparent asset-purchasing process than the proposed bill calls for, and this market value set by Merrill Lynch -- in the likely event that the company wasn't holding a particularly bad batch of subprime mortgages -- should act as a guideline for those negotiations.
One of the worries over the bailout is that it's very difficult to value sour assets since no two are the same. But this is a nice advantage of using the Merrill-Lone Star deal as a yardstick since, presumably, the CDOs Merrill sold were also like snowflakes. It would depend on the composition of the Merrill assets, but if they are relatively representative of the mortgage-backed CDO universe, then that would add to the argument for using 22-cents-on-the-dollar as a measuring stick.
This isn't to say that the government can buy the CDOs at that price because if more firms were willing to accept
$0.22, there'd be less mystery and fear surrounding bank balance sheets. But it's hard to see the case for the government paying much more.
It sold roughly $31 billion worth of mortgage-linked CDOs to investment management firm Lone Star at $0.22 on the dollar for a total of $6.7 billion. This deal has popped up in recent coverage of the events of last week in both the WSJ and NYT as Merrill was forced to sell itself to Bank of America.
The proposed bill by the Treasury Department says that the initial $700 billion in bailout funds would be used to buy "mortgage-related assets." It's hard to say how much of what Wall St. firms want to get off their books is in CDO form, but you'd have to bet that a significant portion of it is just that.
Hopefully, the political jockeying over the bailout will lead to a much more transparent asset-purchasing process than the proposed bill calls for, and this market value set by Merrill Lynch -- in the likely event that the company wasn't holding a particularly bad batch of subprime mortgages -- should act as a guideline for those negotiations.
One of the worries over the bailout is that it's very difficult to value sour assets since no two are the same. But this is a nice advantage of using the Merrill-Lone Star deal as a yardstick since, presumably, the CDOs Merrill sold were also like snowflakes. It would depend on the composition of the Merrill assets, but if they are relatively representative of the mortgage-backed CDO universe, then that would add to the argument for using 22-cents-on-the-dollar as a measuring stick.
This isn't to say that the government can buy the CDOs at that price because if more firms were willing to accept
$0.22, there'd be less mystery and fear surrounding bank balance sheets. But it's hard to see the case for the government paying much more.
See more in
Recent Blog Posts
- Should the Fed Go Long?
- Dec 1 2008 4:38PM EST
- Bernanke's Speech
- Dec 1 2008 2:58PM EST
- Even Nobel Economists Can Be Intellectually Dishonest
- Nov 30 2008 9:36AM EST
- A 5-Point Plan for Getting Out of This
- Nov 28 2008 1:24PM EST
- Do Markets Filter Irrationality?
- Nov 26 2008 11:25PM EST
- Are Percentages Really That Hard?
- Nov 26 2008 10:07PM EST
- Chart of the Day
- Nov 25 2008 3:27PM EST
- Highlights of the Citi Bailout
- Nov 24 2008 12:29AM EST
- 24 Hours in the Stock Markets
- Nov 23 2008 6:44PM EST
- Bloomberg Not Shy About Buts
- Nov 22 2008 12:55AM EST
- FDIC Not Insuring Fed Funds
- Nov 21 2008 10:30PM EST
- Counterparty Risk and Potential Losses from OTC Derivatives
- Nov 20 2008 4:27PM EST
- Dining Democracy
- Nov 19 2008 6:44AM EST
- Recession Dating
- Nov 17 2008 11:21AM EST
- The Best and Worst Restaurants in Manhattan
- Nov 17 2008 7:45AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog











