Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

Global Coordination
Central banks of the world, unite! And fail to calm markets.
Stocks reacted well while treasuries lost ground this morning to overnight news that as much as $180 billion worth of funds was pumped into financial markets by central banks across the developed world. But the situation had nearly reversed itself by early afternoon. One key piece of news: a stampede for the doors forced Putnam to close a $15 billion money market fund.
The liquidity injection also failed to lower borrowing costs one-to-three months out, a worrying sign, said Wrightson-ICAP chief economist Lou Crandall. In fact, the 3-month Libor-OIS spread (which is very close the TED spread) shot to a new high of 1.48 percent this morning:
Once again, the spread between 3-month Libor and ICAP's 3-month New York Funding Rate hit a new high today:
What accounts for the difference? I speculated on Tuesday that part of it was due to the way the two measures are collected (both because NYFR is anonymous while Libor is not and because NYFR asks for a perceived market rate while Libor tracks the rates offered polled banks).
When I put the question to Crandall, he added that time zone differences could also account for some of the difference, especially when markets are in disarray.
"Part of the difference is that there is more evidence of how bad things are by the time the New York market opens," Crandall said.
Another factor is that the Libor banks, particularly in this environment, may not be borrowing three months out and have much more immediate overnight needs. Asking them about borrowing costs could be a "hypothetical," Crandall added.
Today's coordinated efforts by the Fed and other central banks got the job done in terms of making sure that "everyone gets funding by the end of the day," Crandall said. But, "do people have the confidence to be willing to make committments 90- and 180-days out? Not yet."






