Who in U.S. Gets Hurt Most by Food-Price Inflation?
We know that Wal-Mart and China help the poor by keeping inflationary pressures low on the prices of goods those in the lower income brackets consume. But that benefit is being offset by rising food and energy prices.
In new work, Chicago Fed economist Leslie McGranahan finds the six percent rise in food prices in the U.S. over the last year (July '07 to July '08) has had the largest impact on the poor.
One reason for this is that the poor spend a larger portion of their budget on food than those with higher incomes:
Another reason is that the poor eat out less, and the prices of foods that are consumed at home have risen faster than restaurant prices -- 7.1 percent versus 4.6 percent. Overall, McGranahan finds that those in the bottom 25 percent and those receiving food stamps have been hurt the most. Food-price inflation for the bottom 25 percent is at 6.3 percent compared with 5.8 percent for those in the top 25 percent. For food stamp recipients, food-price inflation is at 6.4 percent. The difference between rich and poor is wider when total inflation is considered: 6.0 percent versus 5.2 percent.
It's worth noting that when food-price inflation is low, poorer households experience less food-price and overall inflation for the same reasons as above.
McGranahan's findings are similar to those by UBS economists in July who found that since 2000, "the lowest-income Americans consumers have seen their price index rise by over 7% more than the highest-income American consumers."
- Should the Fed Go Long?
- Dec 1 2008 4:38PM EST
- Bernanke's Speech
- Dec 1 2008 2:58PM EST
- Even Nobel Economists Can Be Intellectually Dishonest
- Nov 30 2008 9:36AM EST
- A 5-Point Plan for Getting Out of This
- Nov 28 2008 1:24PM EST
- Do Markets Filter Irrationality?
- Nov 26 2008 11:25PM EST
- Are Percentages Really That Hard?
- Nov 26 2008 10:07PM EST
- Chart of the Day
- Nov 25 2008 3:27PM EST
- Highlights of the Citi Bailout
- Nov 24 2008 12:29AM EST
- 24 Hours in the Stock Markets
- Nov 23 2008 6:44PM EST
- Bloomberg Not Shy About Buts
- Nov 22 2008 12:55AM EST
- FDIC Not Insuring Fed Funds
- Nov 21 2008 10:30PM EST
- Counterparty Risk and Potential Losses from OTC Derivatives
- Nov 20 2008 4:27PM EST
- Dining Democracy
- Nov 19 2008 6:44AM EST
- Recession Dating
- Nov 17 2008 11:21AM EST
- The Best and Worst Restaurants in Manhattan
- Nov 17 2008 7:45AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog










