Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT -
House Price Bubble Deflated?
Dec 18 20085:57 pm EDT -
Where Were the Whistleblowers?
Dec 16 200811:03 pm EDT -
It's Just a Recession
Dec 13 200810:20 pm EDT -
Comparing American and European Unemployment Insurance
Dec 12 20087:46 pm EDT -
Back to Normal?
Dec 11 20084:33 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

Olympics and City Economies
Olympics boosters like to say that the games will substantially help lift a city's economy. New York City's bid for 2012, for example, claimed employment would rise by 135,000 and revenues by $12 billion.
The interactive below shows the per-capita city G.D.P. for each of the last four sites that held the summer Olympics. Can you guess the year in which each city was a host?
Sources: I.M.F., e-forecasting
If not, that's ok, because that's the point. Studies of "mega events" like the Super Bowl, World Series, college sports, and various Olympics have all nearly universally arrived at the same conclusion: the economic impact of hosting is minimal, if not negative.
The typical explanation for the small benefit is that the new money pumping through the host-city isn't additional money but replacement money. To avoid the throngs, locals either stay home or go somewhere else to consume. At this year's event in China, Goldman Sachs points to another reason why growth will be inconsequential:
Restrictions on construction, factories, cars and mining to cut pollution and traffic will be a ``short-term'' drag on economic output, Goldman said in a report. Most limits are imposed in Beijing and five nearby provinces and cities, which generate about 26 percent of China's economic output, Hong Kong- based analysts Yu Song and Hong Liang wrote in the Aug. 8 report.
``These measures will likely lead to a visible slowdown in real economic activities, both production and consumption, in August and September,'' the Goldman report said. Though activity will pick up in October, ``we expect a gradually softening economic path in the second half of 2008,'' the analysts wrote.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





