Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT -
House Price Bubble Deflated?
Dec 18 20085:57 pm EDT -
Where Were the Whistleblowers?
Dec 16 200811:03 pm EDT -
It's Just a Recession
Dec 13 200810:20 pm EDT -
Comparing American and European Unemployment Insurance
Dec 12 20087:46 pm EDT -
Back to Normal?
Dec 11 20084:33 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

Marijuana: Not So Bad After All?
Researchers have shown again and again that abusers of the happy smoke drop out of school at higher rates than their peers.
What's been harder to show, however, is why this happens. The prevailing theory is that marijuana impairs memory and/or motivation, which lowers the desire and/or ability to stay in school.
But what if that's not how it works? That's what Daniel F. McCaffrey, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Bing Han, and Phyllis Ellickson of the Rand Corporation propose.
Obtaining data on some 4,500 South Dakotan seventh graders who were tracked through their expected graduation dates, the researchers attempted to piece apart other possible explanations for the link between marijuana use and higher dropout rates. These include a person's "predisposition toward problem behavior, use of substances other than marijuana, peer and family social influences, attachment to conventional institutions such as family, school and religion, emotional distress," and innate preference for enjoying life now as opposed to later. (The students were asked about these things in annual surveys.)
While the researchers first confirm that students who used weed three or more times in a month had a 600 percent higher chance of dropping out, that percentage is cut in half when the above alternative explanations are taken into account.
More surprisingly, when researchers also factored in the frequency of cigarette use, the chance of dropping out from smoking marijuana was no longer statistically significant. (On the other hand, looking at the frequency of alcohol use instead didn't change the probability of dropping out.)
What's going on here? There is little to no evidence that cigarette use by itself should hurt brain power or motivation, so controlling for it shouldn't have changed the chance of dropping out. The likely culprit is that there are some characteristics of marijuana smokers that exist before users start toking up frequently, and that these characteristics weren't properly accounted for. In economic parlance, there was an omitted variable bias. So what's been omitted? The researchers believe that peer or family influences are more likely to be the main drivers of higher dropout rates among marijuana smokers.
There are some caveats though. The study only covers South Dakota, which is quite rural, so other locales might not have the same results. Second, the findings are based on survey data which can be riddled with lies. (But it would be odd for students to tell the truth about smoking marijuana while lying about other seemingly more inane topics.) And lastly, as compelling pieces of evidence as Snoop Dogg and Willie Nelson might be, the findings don't prove that marijuana doesn't hurt brain functioning.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




