Big-Budget Animation
I saw the over-hyped but still very good Pixar film WALL-E this weekend (stunning visuals but the screenplay's originality petered out about halfway through). The film brought in a healthy $62.5 million, but what caught my eye was WALL-E's estimated $180 million price tag -- making it one of the most expensive animated movies ever made.
Does putting that much investment into a non-live action movie make sense? The target audience, young children and I'd guess one parent, is smaller than one for a big budget flick from another genre which can potentially appeal to a number of demographics.
Looking at recent global box office returns reveals an interesting pattern. Since 1994, there've been 15 animated movies made that had budgets over $100 million (not adjusted for inflation). Over the same period, 105 live-action movies with $100+ million budgets were made, according to data from The Numbers. It turns out that the profit margins for the average big-budget live-action movie has been markedly better: 209 percent versus 129 percent.
But the situation is reversed for medium-size budget movies of between $50 million to $100 million. Here, the profit margins for animated movies are significantly better: 348 percent versus 136 percent.
What accounts for the difference? Big-budget clunkers seem to explain some of it.
Four out of the 15 $100+ million animated movies, or 27 percent, actually lost money: Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within, Home on the Range, Treasure Planet, and the Road to El Dorado. For the live-action set, a smaller 15 percent didn't manage to break even at the box office.
WALL-E is sure to turn a profit before it reaches DVD, thanks in part to the minimal dialogue which should go over well in foreign markets. Still, this weekend's performance came in below expectations: After the box office take was announced today, the price of the WALL-E contract on the Hollywood Stock Exchange, which reflects how many millions the film is expected to make in its first four weeks, dropped $23 to $175.
- Harvard's Frankel Likes Taxing Trades
- Oct 9 2008 8:19PM EDT
- Casey B. Mulligan: Sticking to His Guns
- Oct 9 2008 7:34PM EDT
- One Year After the Peak
- Oct 9 2008 4:45PM EDT
- When Banks Are Nationalized
- Oct 9 2008 2:57PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: Fun With Perspective
- Oct 9 2008 1:41PM EDT
- Admitting Defeat
- Oct 9 2008 1:27AM EDT
- Housing Crash May Not Hurt Property Tax Revenues
- Oct 8 2008 6:55PM EDT
- Among Executives, Women Outearn Men
- Oct 8 2008 4:50PM EDT
- A Plan That Just Might Work
- Oct 8 2008 7:55AM EDT
- Will $700 Billion Be Enough?
- Oct 7 2008 4:32PM EDT
- Jobs Given, Jobs Taken Away
- Oct 3 2008 12:32PM EDT
- Away Message
- Oct 1 2008 12:01AM EDT
- No Pain, No Gain
- Sep 30 2008 2:31PM EDT
- Mark Cuban Is Brimming With Originality
- Sep 30 2008 11:57AM EDT
- Case-Shiller Drop Accelerates
- Sep 30 2008 10:44AM EDT
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist












