Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT -
House Price Bubble Deflated?
Dec 18 20085:57 pm EDT -
Where Were the Whistleblowers?
Dec 16 200811:03 pm EDT -
It's Just a Recession
Dec 13 200810:20 pm EDT -
Comparing American and European Unemployment Insurance
Dec 12 20087:46 pm EDT -
Back to Normal?
Dec 11 20084:33 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

Fast Food Doesn't Make You Fat
That's the provocative finding of a new working paper from Michael Anderson and David Matsa, economists at UC Berkeley and Northwestern, respectively.
It's become a truism that more people are eating out, and that the higher caloric content of food consumed at hamburger and pizza joints is making people a lot chunkier than they used to be. In fact, a number of studies have found a strong correlation between body weight and eating out.
But as any statistician will tell you, correlation doesn't prove causation.
To investigate the link, Matsa and Anderson turned to a natural experiment unknowingly created by the government decades ago. The Federal Highway Act of 1956 paved the way for over 42,000 miles of turnpike to be constructed in the United States. One of the unintended consequences of the new Interstate system was that, in rural areas, shopping centers that wanted to attract traveling drivers began to cluster around highways. For the residents of those areas, this development meant easier access to restaurants.
To see if this new supply changed obesity rates, Matsa and Anderson compared the Body Mass Index levels of those living close to highways (0 to 5 miles) with those living farther away (5 to 10 miles) and had less access to restaurants. Using survey data from 11 states, Matsa and Anderson found no difference in the number of overweight, normal, and underweight people in the two areas, suggesting that access to restaurants was not making people fatter.
How can this be? If people are eating out more, and eating more high-calorie meals, why aren't they getting chubbier than those without easy access?
Matsa and Anderson next looked at data on individual eating habits from a survey conducted between 1994 and 1996. When eating out, people reported consuming about 35 percent more calories on average than when they ate at home. But importantly, respondents reduced their caloric intake at home on days they ate out (that's not to say that people were watching their weight, since respondents who reported consuming more at home also tended to eat more when going out). Overall, eating out increased daily caloric intake by only 24 calories. The results for urban and suburban consumers were similar.
Other research into the causes of rising obesity has centered on the role of technological change in modern economies. This paper from Darius Lakdawalla of RAND and Tomas Philipson of the University of Chicago estimates that 40 percent of the rise in obesity from the 1970's to the 1990's can be attributed to cheaper food thanks to a more efficient agricultural industry. The other 60 percent was chalked up to more sedentary lifestyles.
Matsa and Anderson's findings suggest that New York City's move to force many restaurants to list the caloric content of menu items will likely have little to no effect on obesity levels.
The findings also suggest that I shouldn't feel so bad about having Taco Bell for dinner three times a week.
(Credit: Steve Liss)






