China Helps the Poor, Not the Middle Class
Very good discussion of income inequality over at Felix's blog by way of James Surowiecki's column in the latest New Yorker, which is by way of this paper appearing to show that income inequality between the rich and the poor is less than we generally think it is -- thanks to trade with China.
But I think there is one aspect of the research that's being overlooked which is worth expounding upon here.
What Christian Broda and John Romalis are looking at in their paper is inequality as measured by the income differential between the top 10 percent and the bottom 10 percent of earners. The following chart from the paper shows that this bottom 10 percent earns somewhere less than $20,000 per year. (click image for larger version)
This next chart shows inflation -- when factoring in both trade with China and new goods bias -- was relatively much lower for those earning less than $12,000 to 15,000. (click image for larger version)
Inequality can be used to talk about different concepts, and I think those of us who don't fall into the less $15K-per-year income bracket (unless you're in school of course), can forget about this. Broda and Romalis don't do a great job of distinguishing it either.
The upshot to all of this is that it can make sense to say that inequality between the richest and the poorest may not be as wide as we thought it was, given conventional measures, but that trade with China apears to have had little to moderate effect on inequality between the middle class and the rich.
- Chart of the Day: The Everyday Economics Bubble
- Jul 3 2008 2:11PM EDT
- Sarbanes-Oxley: It's Delicious, and (Mostly) Good for You
- Jul 2 2008 7:30PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: The Perils of Never Getting Hitched
- Jul 2 2008 12:35PM EDT
- Study Guides: Federal Reserve Edition
- Jul 1 2008 1:46PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: Young Baby Boomers and Earnings Growth
- Jun 30 2008 12:35PM EDT
- Marijuana: Not So Bad After All?
- Jun 30 2008 11:45AM EDT
- Big-Budget Animation
- Jun 29 2008 11:15PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: Stimulus Tracker
- Jun 27 2008 5:09PM EDT
- Roses Aren't Green for Bulls
- Jun 26 2008 9:46PM EDT
- Inflation Expectations: Main St. Versus Wall St.
- Jun 25 2008 6:55PM EDT
- Who Killed the Economy?
- Jun 25 2008 9:30AM EDT
- The Economics of Heroism
- Jun 24 2008 12:56PM EDT
- Is the Great Moderation in Danger?
- Jun 23 2008 4:40PM EDT
- The Minimum Wage and Employment
- Jun 21 2008 10:56PM EDT
- Report: Coverage of Economy Heavily Skewed Towards Business
- Jun 20 2008 3:27PM EDT
Archive
Jul 2008
Categories
- advertising
- aging
- altruism
- art
- baseball
- basketball
- behavior
- books
- business cycles
- charts
- compensation
- crime
- derivatives
- diminishing returns
- drugs
- education
- elections
- energy
- ethics
- finance
- football
- foreign exchange
- gambling
- gender
- globalization
- golf
- growth
- happiness
- health care
- history
- incentives
- inequality
- inflation
- interactive
- intolerance
- investing
- jobs
- marriage
- media
- monetary policy
- movies
- music
- obesity
- painting
- politics
- population
- prediction markets
- privacy
- psychology
- racism
- random
- real estate
- regulation
- religion
- roundup
- sex
- spending
- sports
- taxes
- this and that
- trade
- war
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Unconventional Wisdom

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers





