Mortgage Fraud Rampant
In my post on Wednesday, I questioned the claim that the dollar value of mortgage fraud was surging, arguing that firms had just become more aware of fraud and filing more suspicious activity reports, but catching on to fraud before the loan was finalized.
In the comments, Ann Fulmer, vice president of Interthinx, a firm that tracks mortgage fraud, disagreed with me wholeheartedly. Her main point was that many banks and lenders aren't required to file suspicious activity reports with the FBI, so the Bureau's numbers aren't reflective of the real trend. Here is more from an email she sent me:
We screen mortgage applications for indications of fraud and have not seen a slow down even though origination volumes are down, which suggests that fraud is increasing. Our numbers reflect the fact that fraud is shifting from a crime of profit to a crime of desperation as mortgage professionals whose livelihood is dependent on closing the sale and mortgage get "creative" in an effort to maintain their income, and as borrowers who must now have W-2 income and a substantial down payment get "creative" (with the assistance of said professionals) in order to qualify.It may be true that some of the increase is an artifact of better reporting by lenders, but as I posted in my comment to your article, the FBI numbers are significantly understated because only 1/3 of lenders are required to file SARs (the basis for the FBI report), many lenders do not recognize or report fraud when loans go into default, and the dollar loss reported is only the direct loss to lenders and doesn't account to the collateral damage to neighborhoods and local governments.
Interthinx also recently said that it uncovered $11 billion worth of fraud in mortgage applications. I'm sympathetic to Fulmer's claims, but I'm not 100 percent convinced. The $11 billion figure is associated with applications and not actual loans, and the reporting problems described in her comments seem like they might exist throughout all years and are not specific to the last year.
Fulmer got into the mortgage fraud industry in a very interesting way. You can read more about her here.
- Should the Fed Go Long?
- Dec 1 2008 4:38PM EST
- Bernanke's Speech
- Dec 1 2008 2:58PM EST
- Even Nobel Economists Can Be Intellectually Dishonest
- Nov 30 2008 9:36AM EST
- A 5-Point Plan for Getting Out of This
- Nov 28 2008 1:24PM EST
- Do Markets Filter Irrationality?
- Nov 26 2008 11:25PM EST
- Are Percentages Really That Hard?
- Nov 26 2008 10:07PM EST
- Chart of the Day
- Nov 25 2008 3:27PM EST
- Highlights of the Citi Bailout
- Nov 24 2008 12:29AM EST
- 24 Hours in the Stock Markets
- Nov 23 2008 6:44PM EST
- Bloomberg Not Shy About Buts
- Nov 22 2008 12:55AM EST
- FDIC Not Insuring Fed Funds
- Nov 21 2008 10:30PM EST
- Counterparty Risk and Potential Losses from OTC Derivatives
- Nov 20 2008 4:27PM EST
- Dining Democracy
- Nov 19 2008 6:44AM EST
- Recession Dating
- Nov 17 2008 11:21AM EST
- The Best and Worst Restaurants in Manhattan
- Nov 17 2008 7:45AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog










