Is Text Messaging a Rip-Off?

Making the rounds today: A University of Leicester scientist estimates that the cost of sending a text message is over four times the price of downloading data from the fancy Hubble Space Telescope.
Nigel Bannister calculates that sending one megabyte's worth of text messages would cost $734. The same amount of data would run about $166 per megabyte for Hubble.
But there is potentially a big problem with Bannister's calculation for those of us in the U.S. He assumes that the average price charged for sending a text message is roughly $0.10. This may very well be the case in the United Kingdom, but it's a different story over here.
If you sign up for your wireless provider's text messaging plan, as most heavy users of texting are likely to do, the price per message comes down dramatically.
For example, T-Mobile charges $4.99 per month for 400 messages, Nextel $5.00 for 300, and AT&T $5.00 for 200. That averages out to a little under $0.02 per message. While most users aren't going to use up all of those messages each month (driving up the average cost), the plans all allow for sending data-heavy pictures and video at no extra charge (driving down cost).
At $0.02 per message the cost of sending a megabyte's worth of text messages is closer to $150, lower than Bannister's calculation for Hubble transmissions. Still, even though his metric for how expensive texting is for the average user doesn't seem to work for the U.S., the main question still remains: Is texting a rip-off?
Last year, BusinessWeek estimated that profit margins for data services are in the 75 to 90 percent range. Couple that with the fact that you can send texts for free on the web, and you can see why data was one of the few bright spots in Sprint's weak earnings announcement today.
(Credit: NASA/Roger Ressmeyer/CORBIS)
- Harvard's Frankel Likes Taxing Trades
- Oct 9 2008 8:19PM EDT
- Casey B. Mulligan: Sticking to His Guns
- Oct 9 2008 7:34PM EDT
- One Year After the Peak
- Oct 9 2008 4:45PM EDT
- When Banks Are Nationalized
- Oct 9 2008 2:57PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: Fun With Perspective
- Oct 9 2008 1:41PM EDT
- Admitting Defeat
- Oct 9 2008 1:27AM EDT
- Housing Crash May Not Hurt Property Tax Revenues
- Oct 8 2008 6:55PM EDT
- Among Executives, Women Outearn Men
- Oct 8 2008 4:50PM EDT
- A Plan That Just Might Work
- Oct 8 2008 7:55AM EDT
- Will $700 Billion Be Enough?
- Oct 7 2008 4:32PM EDT
- Jobs Given, Jobs Taken Away
- Oct 3 2008 12:32PM EDT
- Away Message
- Oct 1 2008 12:01AM EDT
- No Pain, No Gain
- Sep 30 2008 2:31PM EDT
- Mark Cuban Is Brimming With Originality
- Sep 30 2008 11:57AM EDT
- Case-Shiller Drop Accelerates
- Sep 30 2008 10:44AM EDT
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist












