Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

Grim Budget Outlook Forces Treasury to Bring Back 1-Year Bill
First it was the rebirth of the long bond in 2006, and now, after a 7-year hiatus, the 1-year bill has been given new life as worsening economic conditions mean less tax revenue.
But the rebirth of the 1-year bill won't provide sufficient financing, worried securities industry advisors to the Treasury. From a release today:
The majority of members believe that the addition of the year bill combined with increases to the size and frequency of existing coupon debt over coming quarters will still not be sufficient to satisfy the increased financing needs of the Treasury over the intermediate and longer term.
Other options include bringing back the 3-year note -- which was dumped last May as corporate profits increased tax revenues -- reviving the 7-year note or issuing more 10-year notes.
But the latter two options are unlikely, RBS Greenwich Capital's Stephen Stanley wrote in a research note:
"Treasury will want to think long and hard about locking in hefty issuance for 7 or 10 years, if big deficits are boing to be a two- or three-year cyclical phenomenon."






