Does It Make Sense to Buy Forever Stamps?
The United States Postal Service announced yesterday that the one-year-old Forever stamp -- 1st-class postage that will be good any time in the future even if mailing prices go up -- has been a hot seller as the date of a one-cent hike approaches.
Over 6 billion have been purchased since last April comprising roughly 17 percent of all stamps sales.
"We introduced these stamps as a customer convenience to ease the transition during price changes, and they also deliver economic value," the Postal Service said in a press release.
Does that claim hold up? Looking back at rate hikes over the past 30 years, it would be hard to make a good case for buying Forevers as they haven't kept up with inflation.

If the Forever stamp had been introduced in 1978, you would've been better off spending the $0.15 on most anything else. At all points in the following 30-years the inflation-adjusted price of stamps was less than $0.15. There would have been no point in hedging against rising stamp prices.
For individuals, the economic loss is tiny, if you'd stocked up with $100 worth of Forever stamps in 1978 and used them over the next 30 years, you'd be out $2. But for the postal service, the overall gains would've provided a small boost to revenues. (People who would've put off buying stamps until after a price hike would now have some incentive to buy Forevers instead.)
Going forward, the Forever stamps still won't make sense economically for consumers since rate hikes are capped at C.P.I.
But because of the small costs involved, the first part of the Postal Service quote above seems accurate: If I was about to buy a packet of stamps before the price hike next month, I'd opt for the Forever stamps. There is something defeating about having to buy one-cent stamps so you can use your old postage.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile- The Year in Research
- Dec 31 2008 9:13AM EST
- Mind Your Value Judgements
- Dec 19 2008 7:52PM EST
- S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
- Dec 19 2008 3:45PM EST
- Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
- Dec 19 2008 2:31PM EST
- Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
- Dec 18 2008 8:57PM EST
- House Price Bubble Deflated?
- Dec 18 2008 5:57PM EST
- Where Were the Whistleblowers?
- Dec 16 2008 11:03PM EST
- It's Just a Recession
- Dec 13 2008 10:20PM EST
- Comparing American and European Unemployment Insurance
- Dec 12 2008 7:46PM EST
- Back to Normal?
- Dec 11 2008 4:33PM EST
- Chart of the Day: Japan Under Quantitative Easing
- Dec 10 2008 4:11PM EST
- Don't Cry for Capitalism
- Dec 9 2008 4:13PM EST
- Can We Remember the Pain of Bubbles Past?
- Dec 8 2008 4:58PM EST
- The Pain to Come
- Dec 5 2008 6:04PM EST
- The Lending Standards Red Herring
- Dec 4 2008 3:34PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog







