Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

Terror Tactics
Should you de-bin Laden your portfolio?
A new set of terror-free stock indexes launched today by London's FTSE helps answer that question for investors wanting to clean up their holdings.
The products were launched in response to a growing number of private and public investments funds in the U.S. which are prohibited from investing in companies that do business in Iran, Sudan, Syria and North Korea.
The FTSE says it identified 239 companies with ties to one of the four nations, but the British indexer won't say which ones, making a direct comparison tricky. (The majority of the screened-out companies have ties with Iran.) It does, however, provide a list of the 10 biggest companies in its Terror-Free All-World ex-US index.
Comparing these companies to the 10 largest companies flagged by the S.E.C. for having businesses in rogue nations -- a list which the S.E.C. later retracted -- it turns out that, since 2007, terror-full investing was more profitable:
- The stocks of the 10 largest terror-free companies -- which include Vodafone, Gazprom, Novartis, Telefonica, E.ON, Daimler, Anglo American, Suez, China Mobile, and Petrobras -- lost 5 percent since the start of 2007.
- The stocks of the 10 S.E.C.-flagged companies -- which include ABN Ambro, Banco Bilbao, BP, ConocoPhillips, Eni SpA, HSBC, Mitsubishi UFJ, Nokia, Royal Dutch Shell, Siemens, and Total -- gained 10 percent.
But the FTSE argues that investors putting money into index funds aren't looking for short-term returns. And, over a longer time horizon, the returns from terror-freedom are on par with that of terror-full stocks. Average annual returns over the past three years for the two versions of the All World-ex US index were both about 17 percent, the company says.
And that's not too shabby when compared with other types of socially responsible investing. According to data from the Social Investment Forum, the terror-free index's return beats that of all other socially motivated funds, which are typically motivated by liberal political beliefs.
And given that terrorism is a Republican issue, ethical investing may be the only area where the Grand Old Party is out in front these days.






