Terror Tactics
Should you de-bin Laden your portfolio?
A new set of terror-free stock indexes launched today by London's FTSE helps answer that question for investors wanting to clean up their holdings.
The products were launched in response to a growing number of private and public investments funds in the U.S. which are prohibited from investing in companies that do business in Iran, Sudan, Syria and North Korea.
The FTSE says it identified 239 companies with ties to one of the four nations, but the British indexer won't say which ones, making a direct comparison tricky. (The majority of the screened-out companies have ties with Iran.) It does, however, provide a list of the 10 biggest companies in its Terror-Free All-World ex-US index.
Comparing these companies to the 10 largest companies flagged by the S.E.C. for having businesses in rogue nations -- a list which the S.E.C. later retracted -- it turns out that, since 2007, terror-full investing was more profitable:
- The stocks of the 10 largest terror-free companies -- which include Vodafone, Gazprom, Novartis, Telefonica, E.ON, Daimler, Anglo American, Suez, China Mobile, and Petrobras -- lost 5 percent since the start of 2007.
- The stocks of the 10 S.E.C.-flagged companies -- which include ABN Ambro, Banco Bilbao, BP, ConocoPhillips, Eni SpA, HSBC, Mitsubishi UFJ, Nokia, Royal Dutch Shell, Siemens, and Total -- gained 10 percent.
But the FTSE argues that investors putting money into index funds aren't looking for short-term returns. And, over a longer time horizon, the returns from terror-freedom are on par with that of terror-full stocks. Average annual returns over the past three years for the two versions of the All World-ex US index were both about 17 percent, the company says.
And that's not too shabby when compared with other types of socially responsible investing. According to data from the Social Investment Forum, the terror-free index's return beats that of all other socially motivated funds, which are typically motivated by liberal political beliefs.
And given that terrorism is a Republican issue, ethical investing may be the only area where the Grand Old Party is out in front these days.
- Should the Fed Go Long?
- Dec 1 2008 4:38PM EST
- Bernanke's Speech
- Dec 1 2008 2:58PM EST
- Even Nobel Economists Can Be Intellectually Dishonest
- Nov 30 2008 9:36AM EST
- A 5-Point Plan for Getting Out of This
- Nov 28 2008 1:24PM EST
- Do Markets Filter Irrationality?
- Nov 26 2008 11:25PM EST
- Are Percentages Really That Hard?
- Nov 26 2008 10:07PM EST
- Chart of the Day
- Nov 25 2008 3:27PM EST
- Highlights of the Citi Bailout
- Nov 24 2008 12:29AM EST
- 24 Hours in the Stock Markets
- Nov 23 2008 6:44PM EST
- Bloomberg Not Shy About Buts
- Nov 22 2008 12:55AM EST
- FDIC Not Insuring Fed Funds
- Nov 21 2008 10:30PM EST
- Counterparty Risk and Potential Losses from OTC Derivatives
- Nov 20 2008 4:27PM EST
- Dining Democracy
- Nov 19 2008 6:44AM EST
- Recession Dating
- Nov 17 2008 11:21AM EST
- The Best and Worst Restaurants in Manhattan
- Nov 17 2008 7:45AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog










