Recession Angst
It can't be easy being a College Republican recruiter these days.
With the economy in tatters and signs that recent graduates are more interested in philanthropy than finance, the traditional business-friendly message of John McCain-types is undoubtedly falling on many deaf, young ears.
And now there's some proof that this more than mere conjecture.
Looking at two different global surveys which ask respondents about economic beliefs, a new working paper finds that people who lived through negative economic shocks like recessions were more likely to support government redistribution, believe that luck has more to do with success than effort, align themselves with the political left, and have less faith in the president, Congress, and, oddly, organized labor. (The research, conducted by Paola Giuliano of Harvard University and Antonio Spilimbergo of the I.M.F., also found that being Protestant reduced the taste for redistribution.)
"The impact seems to be pretty big," Giuliano told me. "If people live in bad macroeconomic times, then they seem to systematically move to the left."
And the effect was only relevant for those who were between 18- and 25-years-old when the rough times hit. The reason? That's when our core beliefs and values are formed. In fact, the researchers found that bad economic times had very little ideological influence on people older than 25 and those who didn't live through a recession during their formative years.
Other studies looking at how economic beliefs are formed have shown that people who lived through stock market booms are more likely to be risk seekers, and corporate managers who were alive during the Great Depression spent the company money more conservatively.
In the new study, Giuliano and Spilimbergo also found that left-leaning effects lasted through the age of 41, so, depending on how bad you think the current downturn will be, the next 20 years could be auspicious ones for the Democrats.
- Should the Fed Go Long?
- Dec 1 2008 4:38PM EST
- Bernanke's Speech
- Dec 1 2008 2:58PM EST
- Even Nobel Economists Can Be Intellectually Dishonest
- Nov 30 2008 9:36AM EST
- A 5-Point Plan for Getting Out of This
- Nov 28 2008 1:24PM EST
- Do Markets Filter Irrationality?
- Nov 26 2008 11:25PM EST
- Are Percentages Really That Hard?
- Nov 26 2008 10:07PM EST
- Chart of the Day
- Nov 25 2008 3:27PM EST
- Highlights of the Citi Bailout
- Nov 24 2008 12:29AM EST
- 24 Hours in the Stock Markets
- Nov 23 2008 6:44PM EST
- Bloomberg Not Shy About Buts
- Nov 22 2008 12:55AM EST
- FDIC Not Insuring Fed Funds
- Nov 21 2008 10:30PM EST
- Counterparty Risk and Potential Losses from OTC Derivatives
- Nov 20 2008 4:27PM EST
- Dining Democracy
- Nov 19 2008 6:44AM EST
- Recession Dating
- Nov 17 2008 11:21AM EST
- The Best and Worst Restaurants in Manhattan
- Nov 17 2008 7:45AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog










