More Dissents at the Bernanke Fed
With today's double-dissent, over 50 percent of the F.O.M.C. meetings that Bernanke has chaired in his two years as the head of the F.O.M.C. have featured a nay-sayer.
In comparison, the second half of Greenspan's tenure only had 15 dissents across 69 meetings -- Bernanke's got 9 so far over 17 meetings.
But the higher level of dissent during the Bernanke Fed doesn't necessarily mean there's more disagreement than there was in the past.
Obtaining data on private internal discussions at Fed meetings during the first half of the Greenspan Fed -- which had a little over 50 dissents between 1987 and 1997 -- Ellen Meade of American University found that the level of voiced objections, as opposed to publicly announced objections, was much higher -- 30 percent versus 7.5 percent.
Bernanke has been more open than his predecessor in encouraging other F.O.M.C. members to express their monetary policy views in public, so if the level of private dissent is the same under the two men, what we might be seeing is the effects of Bernanke's looser hand.
It also seems that dissenters typically err on the side of stricter policy: all but one of the Bernanke nay-sayers has been hawkish. Whether intended or not, these "no" votes have likely helped the Fed maintain some of its inflation fighting credibility. As the fed funds rate heads back toward historical lows, it could be reassuring to some to see the public opposition.
And hawkishness is a common character trait of dissenters. In a separate study, Meade found that two-thirds of nay-sayers between 1978 and 2004 also objected to looser policy.
Voting against lowering rates may also be typical during easing cycles. After nearly two years of no dissents, the Greenspan Fed registered three hawkish "no" votes in 2001 as the fed funds rate was lowered from 6 percent to 1.75 percent.
- Should the Fed Go Long?
- Dec 1 2008 4:38PM EST
- Bernanke's Speech
- Dec 1 2008 2:58PM EST
- Even Nobel Economists Can Be Intellectually Dishonest
- Nov 30 2008 9:36AM EST
- A 5-Point Plan for Getting Out of This
- Nov 28 2008 1:24PM EST
- Do Markets Filter Irrationality?
- Nov 26 2008 11:25PM EST
- Are Percentages Really That Hard?
- Nov 26 2008 10:07PM EST
- Chart of the Day
- Nov 25 2008 3:27PM EST
- Highlights of the Citi Bailout
- Nov 24 2008 12:29AM EST
- 24 Hours in the Stock Markets
- Nov 23 2008 6:44PM EST
- Bloomberg Not Shy About Buts
- Nov 22 2008 12:55AM EST
- FDIC Not Insuring Fed Funds
- Nov 21 2008 10:30PM EST
- Counterparty Risk and Potential Losses from OTC Derivatives
- Nov 20 2008 4:27PM EST
- Dining Democracy
- Nov 19 2008 6:44AM EST
- Recession Dating
- Nov 17 2008 11:21AM EST
- The Best and Worst Restaurants in Manhattan
- Nov 17 2008 7:45AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog











