A Lesson From Bear: Don't Hold Large Chunks of Company Stock
Amidst the fallout from Bear Stearns' collapse is word that employees are out some $5.2 billion as the company's stock plummeted.
Like many other Wall St. firms, Bear has an employee stock ownership plan and about a third of outstanding stock is held by workers.
(It's unclear, however, how many employees had a large portion of their portfolios in Bear stock. On one hand, people working at an investment bank might be expected to be knowledgeable enough to avoid concentrated positions, but then again, Bear has been proud of its partnership roots so ownership of company stock was encouraged.)
But while Bears' demise is an outlier, it still highlights the potentially large risk in tying up a large portion of your savings in company stock.
Across the country, employee stock ownership is on the rise -- at least through 2007 -- according to The National Center for Employee Ownership. Over 11 million employees in the U.S. participated in ownership plans worth $928 billion in 2007, up nearly 40 percent from 2006's $675 billion figure. Outside of the world of employee stock ownership plans, some 11 million 401(k) plan participants are estimated to hold at least 20 percent of their retirement portfolios in company stock.
Defenders of stock ownership plans point to the tax benefits employees are eligible for and the "ownership culture" that the plans foster.
But a survey of employees conducted jointly by researchers at the University of Chicago, UCLA, and Vanguard published last year in the The Journal of Law & Economics found that less than 10 percent of employees were aware of the tax breaks.
The research also found very little support for the idea that companies with such plans experience gains in productivity. In fact, there was evidence that employees might actually become less motivated during a bear market.
The lesson from this, of course, is that diversification is the way to go, especially if you work at a large company like Bear where it's much harder to see how productivity improvements by one peon impact the bottom line.
But the real kicker comes from this bit of research by Lisa Meulbroek of Claremont McKenna College in California. When taking into account the risks associated with owning company stock in an undiversified portfolio for workers who expect to stay with a company for a long time, she found that one dollar of company stock was only worth 50 cents. For Bear Stearns employees, it's much less than that.
UPDATE
Corey Rosen, the cofounder of the National Center for Employee Ownership, writes helpfully in the comments that:
There were three retirement plans with about $1.35 billion at the end of 2007. The employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) owned $285 million in Bear Stearns stock, under 3%. So from a retirement asset standpoint, employees lost about 22% of their retirement assets.
Read the rest of his comment for another viewpoint.
- Chart of the Day: The Everyday Economics Bubble
- Jul 3 2008 2:11PM EDT
- Sarbanes-Oxley: It's Delicious, and (Mostly) Good for You
- Jul 2 2008 7:30PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: The Perils of Never Getting Hitched
- Jul 2 2008 12:35PM EDT
- Study Guides: Federal Reserve Edition
- Jul 1 2008 1:46PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: Young Baby Boomers and Earnings Growth
- Jun 30 2008 12:35PM EDT
- Marijuana: Not So Bad After All?
- Jun 30 2008 11:45AM EDT
- Big-Budget Animation
- Jun 29 2008 11:15PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: Stimulus Tracker
- Jun 27 2008 5:09PM EDT
- Roses Aren't Green for Bulls
- Jun 26 2008 9:46PM EDT
- Inflation Expectations: Main St. Versus Wall St.
- Jun 25 2008 6:55PM EDT
- Who Killed the Economy?
- Jun 25 2008 9:30AM EDT
- The Economics of Heroism
- Jun 24 2008 12:56PM EDT
- Is the Great Moderation in Danger?
- Jun 23 2008 4:40PM EDT
- The Minimum Wage and Employment
- Jun 21 2008 10:56PM EDT
- Report: Coverage of Economy Heavily Skewed Towards Business
- Jun 20 2008 3:27PM EDT
Archive
Jul 2008
Categories
- advertising
- aging
- altruism
- art
- baseball
- basketball
- behavior
- books
- business cycles
- charts
- compensation
- crime
- derivatives
- diminishing returns
- drugs
- education
- elections
- energy
- ethics
- finance
- football
- foreign exchange
- gambling
- gender
- globalization
- golf
- growth
- happiness
- health care
- history
- incentives
- inequality
- inflation
- interactive
- intolerance
- investing
- jobs
- marriage
- media
- monetary policy
- movies
- music
- obesity
- painting
- politics
- population
- prediction markets
- privacy
- psychology
- racism
- random
- real estate
- regulation
- religion
- roundup
- sex
- spending
- sports
- taxes
- this and that
- trade
- war
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Unconventional Wisdom

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers





