Chart of the Day: Suicides and the Golden Gate
A question for those of you who live in the Bay area: If you wanted to commit suicide off the Golden Gate Bridge, where on the structure would you take the leap?
In the middle or closer to one of the coasts (San Francisco or Marin County)? And would you face east towards San Francisco Bay or west towards the great expanse of the Pacific Ocean?
According to this graphic which plots about two-thirds of the known suicides as of 2005, most people choose to face civilization and stay closer to San Francisco.
The graphic is a little misleading in that the bridge is turned 90 degrees clockwise for seemingly aesthetic reasons.
Both of the above patterns, however, make sense. More residents on the San Francisco side mean more suicides closer to that coast, and with the western walkway typically for bikes only and the eastern walkway predominately for pedestrians, you'd also expect more jumpers to face east.
But what doesn't make as much sense is that the most popular area to jump is close to the bridge's 69th pole. This spot is much closer to the less populous Marin county side. (The number of suicides from the 69th pole is statistically significant even when only taking into account data from the eastern side of the bridge.)
The best explanation that I can come up with is that the 69th pole is nearly the same distance from both walkway entrances, so for very determined jumpers it represents the center of the bridge and a near 100 percent chance of certain death. (Although the suicide "success" rate for the entire bridge is close to 99 percent.)
But we also know that the number of attempted suicides is much higher than the number of successful ones, which means that jumpers aren't necessarily looking for a "no-way-out" solution. And just because it's equidistant from both entrances doesn't necessarily mean that it's the highest spot on the bridge, so are there any other explanations?
(Hat tip: Ryan Schick and Taylor Umlauf)
- Chart of the Day: The Everyday Economics Bubble
- Jul 3 2008 2:11PM EDT
- Sarbanes-Oxley: It's Delicious, and (Mostly) Good for You
- Jul 2 2008 7:30PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: The Perils of Never Getting Hitched
- Jul 2 2008 12:35PM EDT
- Study Guides: Federal Reserve Edition
- Jul 1 2008 1:46PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: Young Baby Boomers and Earnings Growth
- Jun 30 2008 12:35PM EDT
- Marijuana: Not So Bad After All?
- Jun 30 2008 11:45AM EDT
- Big-Budget Animation
- Jun 29 2008 11:15PM EDT
- Chart of the Day: Stimulus Tracker
- Jun 27 2008 5:09PM EDT
- Roses Aren't Green for Bulls
- Jun 26 2008 9:46PM EDT
- Inflation Expectations: Main St. Versus Wall St.
- Jun 25 2008 6:55PM EDT
- Who Killed the Economy?
- Jun 25 2008 9:30AM EDT
- The Economics of Heroism
- Jun 24 2008 12:56PM EDT
- Is the Great Moderation in Danger?
- Jun 23 2008 4:40PM EDT
- The Minimum Wage and Employment
- Jun 21 2008 10:56PM EDT
- Report: Coverage of Economy Heavily Skewed Towards Business
- Jun 20 2008 3:27PM EDT
Archive
Jul 2008
Categories
- advertising
- aging
- altruism
- art
- baseball
- basketball
- behavior
- books
- business cycles
- charts
- compensation
- crime
- derivatives
- diminishing returns
- drugs
- education
- elections
- energy
- ethics
- finance
- football
- foreign exchange
- gambling
- gender
- globalization
- golf
- growth
- happiness
- health care
- history
- incentives
- inequality
- inflation
- interactive
- intolerance
- investing
- jobs
- marriage
- media
- monetary policy
- movies
- music
- obesity
- painting
- politics
- population
- prediction markets
- privacy
- psychology
- racism
- random
- real estate
- regulation
- religion
- roundup
- sex
- spending
- sports
- taxes
- this and that
- trade
- war
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Unconventional Wisdom

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers




(click to enlarge)
