Sign In
SHARE
Chart of the Day: Suicides and the Golden Gate
A question for those of you who live in the Bay area: If you wanted to commit suicide off the Golden Gate Bridge, where on the structure would you take the leap?
In the middle or closer to one of the coasts (San Francisco or Marin County)? And would you face east towards San Francisco Bay or west towards the great expanse of the Pacific Ocean?
According to this graphic which plots about two-thirds of the known suicides as of 2005, most people choose to face civilization and stay closer to San Francisco.
(click to enlarge)The graphic is a little misleading in that the bridge is turned 90 degrees clockwise for seemingly aesthetic reasons.
Both of the above patterns, however, make sense. More residents on the San Francisco side mean more suicides closer to that coast, and with the western walkway typically for bikes only and the eastern walkway predominately for pedestrians, you'd also expect more jumpers to face east.
But what doesn't make as much sense is that the most popular area to jump is close to the bridge's 69th pole. This spot is much closer to the less populous Marin county side. (The number of suicides from the 69th pole is statistically significant even when only taking into account data from the eastern side of the bridge.)
The best explanation that I can come up with is that the 69th pole is nearly the same distance from both walkway entrances, so for very determined jumpers it represents the center of the bridge and a near 100 percent chance of certain death. (Although the suicide "success" rate for the entire bridge is close to 99 percent.)
But we also know that the number of attempted suicides is much higher than the number of successful ones, which means that jumpers aren't necessarily looking for a "no-way-out" solution. And just because it's equidistant from both entrances doesn't necessarily mean that it's the highest spot on the bridge, so are there any other explanations?
(Hat tip: Ryan Schick and Taylor Umlauf)
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile
- The Year in Research
- Dec 31 2008 9:13AM EST
- Mind Your Value Judgements
- Dec 19 2008 7:52PM EST
- S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
- Dec 19 2008 3:45PM EST
- Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
- Dec 19 2008 2:31PM EST
- Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
- Dec 18 2008 8:57PM EST
- House Price Bubble Deflated?
- Dec 18 2008 5:57PM EST
- Where Were the Whistleblowers?
- Dec 16 2008 11:03PM EST
- It's Just a Recession
- Dec 13 2008 10:20PM EST
- Comparing American and European Unemployment Insurance
- Dec 12 2008 7:46PM EST
- Back to Normal?
- Dec 11 2008 4:33PM EST
- Chart of the Day: Japan Under Quantitative Easing
- Dec 10 2008 4:11PM EST
- Don't Cry for Capitalism
- Dec 9 2008 4:13PM EST
- Can We Remember the Pain of Bubbles Past?
- Dec 8 2008 4:58PM EST
- The Pain to Come
- Dec 5 2008 6:04PM EST
- The Lending Standards Red Herring
- Dec 4 2008 3:34PM EST
Archive
Categories
Links
- Email me
- Geary Behaviour Centre
- NBER Working Papers
- Social Science Statistics Blog
- Decision Science News
- Freakonomics
- New York Federal Reserve Research
- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
- Marginal Revolution
- EconTalk
- MoneyScience
- VoxEU
- Journal of Interest
- Bluematter
- Economist's View
- Research Recap
- Social Science Research Network
- Institute for the Study of Labor
- EconPapers
- Real Time Economics
- Center for Economic Policy Research
- B.I.S. Working Papers
- C.B.O. Director's Blog
- Federal Reserve Working Papers
- Institute for the Study of Labor
- O.E.C.D. Factblog
- Philadelphia Fed Research
- St. Louis Fed Research
- Sabernomics
- Sabermetric Research
- Economic Principals
- Numbers Guy
- Econbrowser
- STATS Blog
- Jeff Frankel
- Junk Charts
- Predictably/Irrational
- Tim Harford
- TierneyLab
- Curious Capitalist
- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog
