Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT -
House Price Bubble Deflated?
Dec 18 20085:57 pm EDT -
Where Were the Whistleblowers?
Dec 16 200811:03 pm EDT -
It's Just a Recession
Dec 13 200810:20 pm EDT -
Comparing American and European Unemployment Insurance
Dec 12 20087:46 pm EDT -
Back to Normal?
Dec 11 20084:33 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

Does Crime Rise When Welfare Checks Are Delayed?
The stimulus plan that zipped through the House last month has hit a snag in the Senate: Democrats want more help for the poor, unemployed and elderly while Republicans want more tax rebates.
One key hang up for some Democrats is additional funding for the food stamp program. For example, Iowa Senator Tom Harkin -- who incidentally hasn't endorsed a presidential candidate yet -- wants a 20 percent increase in food stamp benefits, or about $85 a month more for a family of three.
No matter how this debate is concluded when the Senate gets back to work tomorrow after Super Tuesday, policy makers should also look at the timing of when welfare benefits are paid, says Harvard economist C. Fritz Foley.
Economists have shown that people who receive cash assistance typically spend them too quickly. So it wouldn't be a stretch to think that the chance that someone would commit a crime to supplement their income could rise as more time passes after an assistance payment.
In a new paper, Foley looked at 12 major cities in the country where at least 10 percent of the residents received one of three types of welfare payments: food stamps, temporary assistance and SSI payments.
Some cities made payments at the beginning of the month while others staggered them throughout. (Payment schedules are set at the federal and state levels, not city.)
He then made two comparisons:
- the crime levels between these two types of cities
- the level of financially motivated crimes like robbery and burglary versus crimes like rape and murder in the cities making early welfare payments. The reason for this latter comparison is that if someone is moved to commit a crime in order to gain money, they're more likely to burglarize or rob than to murder or rape.
Foley found that crime did indeed rise as more time passed after a welfare payment -- on the order of 6 percent.
Payment schedules are currently set largely based on keeping administrative costs low. But Foley's findings imply that
if cities which make payments early -- like Fresno, Newark and Washington, D.C. -- adjusted these schedules, they could see crime levels drop.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





