The Real Cost of Smoking
If you're a smoker, the pack of Marlboro Reds or Camel Lights you're inhaling might only be around $8, but the cost to your life could be many times more. Actually, about 28 times more.
Every pack of cigarettes that an adult male smokes knocks off $222 from the value of that man's life, estimate W. Kip Viscusi and Joni Hersch of Vanderbilt Law School in a new NBER working paper. For women the results are slightly more muted but sizable at $94 per pack in 2006 dollars. The reason for the discrepancy in costs between men and women is that men earn more than women over their lifetimes and are at greater risk of dying from smoking-related illnesses. The method used by Viscusi and Hersch to calculate the value of life is affected by both of these factors.
(Go here for a roundup of the latest efforts by economists to put a price tag on our lives.)
Viscusi and Hersch's analysis is largely based on the assumption that people place a greater value on living a long life rather than savoring a pack of menthols. If smoking is more important to you than living a long life, then the cost per pack would be greatly reduced.
Previous calculations of the personal economic cost of smoking have been between $20 and $30. The reason for the big difference between Viscusi and Hersch's numbers and the past work is because of different accounting methods. The previous research assumed that the chances of dying only increased at the end of life whereas Viscusi and Hersch assume that smoking-related mortality risk exists -- and increases -- throughout life.
So it seems in order to internalize the damage that smokers are doing to their future selves we'd need to put a further tax on cigarettes on the order of 2675%.
Here are the researchers calculations for the value of life for male and female smokers:
| Age | Men | Women |
| 24 | $5.98 million | $5.17 million |
| 25-34 | $7.32 | $6.04 |
| 35-44 | $8.68 | $6.72 |
| 45-54 | $9.31 | $7.00 |
| 55-64 | $9.17 | $6.52 |
It might be surprising to see that a 55-year-old male smoker is more "valuable" than a 24-year-old male smoker. Doesn't the younger man have most of his life ahead of him?
The trick here is that the above calculations are based on how much someone is willing to pay to reduce their risk of dying. Since a 24-year-old doesn't have the same resources as an older person to invest in risk reduction, that means that, in the world of econometrics, their life is worth less.
UPDATE: Here is my interview with Viscusi on this paper.
- Legalizing Insider Trading, With a Catch
- May 9 2008 5:34PM EDT
- Real Housewives of NYC -- A Lot of Them
- May 8 2008 7:10PM EDT
- When Envy Trumps Ambition
- May 7 2008 8:29AM EDT
- Achieving Universal Coverage at No Extra Cost
- May 1 2008 11:19AM EDT
- Gambling Strategies: Always Bet on White (Referees)
- Apr 30 2008 10:10PM EDT
- Unanswered Questions: To Pause or Not to Pause?
- Apr 30 2008 3:39PM EDT
- Grim Budget Outlook Forces Treasury to Bring Back 1-Year Bill
- Apr 30 2008 11:58AM EDT
- Does It Make Sense to Buy Forever Stamps?
- Apr 29 2008 9:58PM EDT
- When Jews and Christians Compete
- Apr 28 2008 10:05PM EDT
- Questioning the Link Between Commodity Wealth and Oppression
- Apr 25 2008 1:59PM EDT
- What's Up With the Manufacturing Data?
- Apr 24 2008 2:19PM EDT
- Don't Blame China for Rise in Inequality
- Apr 22 2008 6:11PM EDT
- Have Wages Kept Up With Productivity Growth?
- Apr 22 2008 1:53PM EDT
- The Death of Mega-Contracts in Baseball?
- Apr 21 2008 12:15AM EDT
- Should Short-Selling Be Restricted?
- Apr 17 2008 12:41PM EDT
Archive
May 2008
Categories
- advertising
- aging
- altruism
- art
- baseball
- basketball
- behavior
- books
- business cycles
- charts
- compensation
- crime
- derivatives
- drugs
- education
- elections
- ethics
- finance
- football
- foreign exchange
- gambling
- gender
- globalization
- golf
- growth
- happiness
- health care
- history
- incentives
- inequality
- interactive
- intolerance
- investing
- jobs
- marriage
- media
- monetary policy
- movies
- music
- obesity
- painting
- politics
- population
- prediction markets
- privacy
- psychology
- racism
- random
- religion
- roundup
- sex
- spending
- sports
- taxes
- trade
- war
Links
- Email me

- Bluematter

- Decision Science News

- Economist's View

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Freakonomics

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Journal of Interest

- Marginal Revolution

- MoneyScience

- NBER Working Papers

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Unconventional Wisdom

- VoxEU





