Unintended Consequences of Transparency
In the Spring of 1998, Cornell University made public the typical grades awarded in courses at the school. So, for example, a student could see that in the Spring of 2007 the median, or middle-most, grade for Introduction to Cryptology was a B.
Question: How would this extra information influence the way you pick classes? Would you register for a course that you're interested in regardless of the fact that it could be difficult, or would you pick courses where the median grade was an A in order to help pad your grade point average?
That's what Talia Bar, Vrinda Kadiyali, and Asaf Zussman of Cornell tried to find out.
They documented that web traffic to the site that held the median grade information peaks during registration periods, suggesting that students were indeed using the information to pick courses.

They also found that the percentage of students enrolled in courses with a median grade of A increased by a whopping 50 percent. And this has had an effect on the typical grade awarded at Cornell: the mean grade has increased from 3.1 in 1990 (on a 4.3 point scale -- that extra 0.3 is because Cornell awards A+'s) to 3.3 in 2004.
The usual grade inflation story is that professors are the ones padding grades, but in this case students are very much helping the process. And the researchers found that 60 percent of the rise in the average grade can be attributed to students picking easier classes.
The irony is that Cornell initially planned to include the median grade information on students' transcripts so that prospective employers, graduate schools, and grant-awarding foundations would have better information about a candidate's grades. Seeing that a student received a B in isolation tells you a different story than seeing that the median grade for the course was a C+.
But for reasons unknown, that part of the plan was not put into place -- until Spring 2008, that is. And some students don't seem to like that idea .
- Should the Fed Go Long?
- Dec 1 2008 4:38PM EST
- Bernanke's Speech
- Dec 1 2008 2:58PM EST
- Even Nobel Economists Can Be Intellectually Dishonest
- Nov 30 2008 9:36AM EST
- A 5-Point Plan for Getting Out of This
- Nov 28 2008 1:24PM EST
- Do Markets Filter Irrationality?
- Nov 26 2008 11:25PM EST
- Are Percentages Really That Hard?
- Nov 26 2008 10:07PM EST
- Chart of the Day
- Nov 25 2008 3:27PM EST
- Highlights of the Citi Bailout
- Nov 24 2008 12:29AM EST
- 24 Hours in the Stock Markets
- Nov 23 2008 6:44PM EST
- Bloomberg Not Shy About Buts
- Nov 22 2008 12:55AM EST
- FDIC Not Insuring Fed Funds
- Nov 21 2008 10:30PM EST
- Counterparty Risk and Potential Losses from OTC Derivatives
- Nov 20 2008 4:27PM EST
- Dining Democracy
- Nov 19 2008 6:44AM EST
- Recession Dating
- Nov 17 2008 11:21AM EST
- The Best and Worst Restaurants in Manhattan
- Nov 17 2008 7:45AM EST
Categories
Links
- Email me

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- NBER Working Papers

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- Decision Science News

- Freakonomics

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Marginal Revolution

- EconTalk

- MoneyScience

- VoxEU

- Journal of Interest

- Bluematter

- Economist's View

- Research Recap

- Social Science Research Network

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- EconPapers

- Real Time Economics

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Sabernomics

- Sabermetric Research

- Economic Principals

- Numbers Guy

- Econbrowser

- STATS Blog

- Jeff Frankel

- Junk Charts

- Predictably/Irrational

- Tim Harford

- TierneyLab

- Curious Capitalist

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog










