Recent Blog Posts
-
The Year in Research
Dec 31 20089:13 am EDT -
Mind Your Value Judgements
Dec 19 20087:52 pm EDT -
S.E.C. Short-Sale Ban: Pretty Much Useless
Dec 19 20083:45 pm EDT -
Advice from Japan: Don't Forget TARP 1
Dec 19 20082:31 pm EDT -
Chart of the Day: Money Market Stress Easing
Dec 18 20088:57 pm EDT -
House Price Bubble Deflated?
Dec 18 20085:57 pm EDT -
Where Were the Whistleblowers?
Dec 16 200811:03 pm EDT -
It's Just a Recession
Dec 13 200810:20 pm EDT -
Comparing American and European Unemployment Insurance
Dec 12 20087:46 pm EDT -
Back to Normal?
Dec 11 20084:33 pm EDT
Links
- Junk Charts

- Economic Principals

- New York Federal Reserve Research

- Sabernomics

- Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

- Sabermetric Research

- St. Louis Fed Research

- Bluematter

- NBER Working Papers

- TierneyLab

- Numbers Guy

- Social Science Statistics Blog

- DataPoints: The Dismal Scientist Blog

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Predictably/Irrational

- Decision Science News

- Research Recap

- Econbrowser

- Center for Economic Policy Research

- Economist's View

- B.I.S. Working Papers

- Geary Behaviour Centre

- Real Time Economics

- Federal Reserve Working Papers

- C.B.O. Director's Blog

- Curious Capitalist

- VoxEU

- Freakonomics

- Philadelphia Fed Research

- O.E.C.D. Factblog

- MoneyScience

- Journal of Interest

- STATS Blog

- Email me

- EconTalk

- EconPapers

- Marginal Revolution

- Tim Harford

- Jeff Frankel

- Institute for the Study of Labor

- Social Science Research Network

Credit Derivatives Increase the Cost of Borrowing
That's the counterintuitive finding from a new working paper from economists at the New York Fed. And it's all about incentives.
But first, why should credit derivatives lower the cost of borrowing in the first place?
Well,
- The opportunity to diversify risk helps banks use their capital more efficiently, and this added efficiency could be passed on to borrowers, the researchers say.
- When banks lend to a business, they gain information that's not readily available to most investors. Banks can spread this information through their actions in the CDS market. This could reduce the cost of borrowing by cutting into the "information premium" that investors put on a business's bonds since that information is now available in the CDS market.
But there is also a downside for businesses: In buying protection against a default through the CDS market and protecting its rear end, the bank reduces its own incentive to actually monitor those loans, which could send borrowing costs for that business higher.
It turns out that this negative effect outweighs the positive ones for firms that have higher credit risk or are more "informationally opaque".
This happens, the researchers argue, because in a syndicated loan (a loan with many banks involved), the lead bank can hedge the loan's risk through the CDS market without the knowledge of outside lenders, which could lead to an increase in loan interest rates.
All the news isn't bad, however, as there is a small positive effect on borrowing costs for safer and more transparent firms. But overall, the impact of the CDS market seems to be that it increases the cost of debt issuance.
The researcher's proposed solution? Regulation.
"Regulators might consider requiring a lead bank in a syndicate to disclose any hedges of retained positions to outside investors. It seems possible that such disclosures would improve outcomes for everyone, including those of the borrower, by mitigating concerns that the lead bank does not have the proper incentives."
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




