Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Google to Newspapers: We're Not the Bad Guys
An awful lot of fingers have been pointed at Google recently. Just in the last few days, the search giant has been accused of kidnapping "orphaned" books, violating trademarks with deceptive keyword ads, and stealing copyrighted news content -- this last by Rupert Murdoch, who's no stranger to playing the villain.
So when the Associated Press announced plans yesterday to combat misuse of news stories by certain nameless web operators, many naturally assumed Google was the main target. But Eric Schmidt says that's not the case.
"I was a little confused by all of the excitement in the news in the last 24 hours," said the Google CEO this afternoon during a keynote appearance at the Newspaper Association of America's annual conference. "I'm not sure what they were referring to. We have a very, very successful deal with AP and hope that will continue for many, many years."
(Echoing his boss, Google's associate general counsel for products and intellectual property, Alexander Macgillivray, wrote on the company's blog that AP's broadside "doesn't appear to pertain" to Google -- particularly since Google actually hosts AP articles on its own servers under the terms of their licensing deal.)
But Schmidt nevertheless seemed to be sending his own not-so-coded message to AP and its newspaper-industry allies when he warned them against waging an all-out legal campaign to stamp out unauthorized re-posting of their content, even if that re-posting might be construed as exceeding the "fair use" permitted by copyright law.
"I would encourage everybody, think in terms of what your reader wants," he said. "These are ultimately consumer businesses and if you piss off enough of them, you will not have any more."






